Laserfiche WebLink
D. An alternative subdrainage system for the coal mine waste area was proposed and <br />approved. The Division found that the alternative would ensure the applicable static safety <br />factor, stability of the fill, and protection of the surface and ground water [Rule 4.10.3(5)]. A <br />naturally occurring subdrainage system at the coal mine waste area is described in a report by <br />Chen & Associates, which is presented in Appendix 4-C of the permit application package. <br />The design of the refuse pile provides a long-term static safety factor of 1.8 and a seismic <br />safety factor of 1.5. These factors are based on geotechnical testing and engineering analysis <br />as detailed in the Chen report. <br />E. The applicant submitted certifications, and the Division field-verified, that there is four <br />feet of cover on the coal processing waste bank [Rule 4.10.4(5)]. <br />V. Revegetation <br />Revegetation information is found in Section 4.4.2.3-Revegetation Plan of the permit, inclusive <br />of pages 4-54 through 4-65. All disturbed areas of the Permit, other than the permanent <br />Developed Water Resources area and the area of four reclaimed water monitoring flumes, have <br />been reclaimed and Phase III Bond Release approved. <br />The Division approved the inclusion of several introduced species in the seed mix. These species <br />include: Russian wildrye (Elymus 'unceus), Crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum), Cicer <br />milkvetch (Astra ag lus cicer), and Orchardgrass Pact lis lomerata . None are considered <br />poisonous or noxious. Four different seed mixes were approved. Seed Mix No. 1 was developed <br />for use on south-facing slopes and harsh locations, like the dry, exposed Mancos Shale areas. <br />Seed Mix No. 2 utilized species adapted for more mesic, cooler, and flatter sites. Seed Mix No. 3 <br />contained species for use on the reclaimed refuse disposal area, mine area, and less harsh road <br />cuts. The fourth seed mix provided a quick effective cover for topsoil stockpiles. <br />The mine was reclaimed between 1986 and 1987 with final grading, seed preparation, and <br />seeding practices performed in the fall of 1987. Seed was planted using a drill seeder in <br />accessible areas with straw mulch crimped for stability. In locations where steep slopes <br />prohibited drill seeding, the appropriate seed mix was broadcast and straw mulch applied and <br />netted for stability. Woods rose Rosa woodsii), mountain mahogany (Cercocarpos montanus), <br />and serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia) were added to the seed mixes prior to planting. The <br />operator committed to live transplant additional shrubs if necessary, to achieve the required <br />woody plant densities. <br />In 1992, Technical Revision No. 12 was submitted to modify the reclamation success standards <br />for the majority of the loadout area due to an approved post-mining land use change to <br />residential/recreational. Reclamation success for the small remaining area at the loadout was <br />measured by comparing it to an extended reference area. <br />The revegetation success criteria for the reclaimed lands are: species diversity, vegetative cover, <br />herbaceous production, and woody plant density. Success was determined by comparison with an <br />undisturbed extended reference area. Baseline data was not collected on the mine area prior to <br />disturbance. The mine area was disturbed prior to the enactment of the current law. In the <br />North Thompson Creek C-1981-025 <br />Permit Renewal 05 <br />12 May 2009 <br />31