My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-05-07_REVISION - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2009-05-07_REVISION - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:46:17 PM
Creation date
5/8/2009 2:58:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/7/2009
Doc Name
Additional Adequacy Comments
From
DRMS
To
Trapper Mining, Inc
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
JDM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. PR-6 application page 3-38a discusses the timing of the Kimber Pit. The text notes that the <br />truck/excavator pit will be divided into three main blocks (A, B, and C) with mining beginning <br />in Block B, Pit 1. According to the information presented on Map M10A Sheet 3 of 3, the <br />timing identifies mining beginning in what would be the A block of the Kimber Pit. <br />Please revise either the map or the text to identify the timing in which the Kimber <br />truck/excavator block will be mined in accordance with Rule 2.05.3(2)(a). <br />4. It is noted that the Air Pollution Control Division Permit I IMF253-1 was modified and issued <br />November 7, 2008. <br />Per Rule 2.03.10, please provide an update to PR-06 submittal page 1-9 to reflect the recently <br />issued permit. <br />5. Un-numbered pages discussing Horse Fill and K/G Pit Buttress Fill provided in the PR-06 <br />submittal contain information concerning a description of the proposed fills. <br />Please incorporate the un-numbered pages into the Trapper Mine Permit per Rule 2.05.3(6)(b). <br />The description should include descriptions of the geotechnical investigations, design, <br />construction, operation, maintenance and removal of the proposed fills as applicable. <br />6. Based on Appendix A of the Agapito Report entitled Horse Gulch Fill Stability Analysis, <br />December 2008 (The Report), the Horse Gulch Fill is a valley fill by definition. Per Rule <br />1.04(148), a valley fill "means a fill structure consisting of any material other than coal waste <br />or organic material that is placed in a valley where the side slopes of the existing valley <br />measured at the steepest point are greater than 20 degrees or the average slope of the profile <br />of the valley from the toe of the fill to the top of the fill is greater than 10 degrees." Appendix <br />A, Horse Gulch General Arrangement, shows three areas highlighted in yellow that exceed <br />35% slope (19.17 degrees). Preliminary calculations indicate an average slope for the drainage <br />profile of 8.6% (4.5 degrees). Given that some side slope areas are represented as exceeding a <br />19 degree slope, Horse Gulch Fill meets the requirements of a valley fill due to the side slopes <br />likely exceeding 20 degrees in places. Therefore, the requirements of 4.09.1 and 4.09.2 apply. <br />Please discuss whether you agree with this determination. It may be determined that the Horse <br />Gulch Fill may also meet the definition of a head-of-hollow fill [Rule 1.04(56)], in which case <br />the additional requirements of 4.09.3 may also apply. A final determination of fill category <br />will be determined by the DRMS engineer who reviews the submittal. Please discuss your <br />position as to whether or not the Horse Gulch Fill may also meet the definition of a head-of- <br />hollow fill. <br />7. Page 23 of the Horse Gulch Fill Stability Report, states that there will be no need to channel <br />storm runoff away from the fill once the fill is constructed. The Division does not agree with <br />this statement. Small areas south of the fill will flow north toward the fill and require diversion <br />into channels designed for the 100 year, 24-hour storm event. (Rule 4.09.2(7)) <br />Additionally, Rule 4.09.2(7) requires that drainage from the fill be diverted into channels <br />designed for the 100-year, 24-hour storm event. No diversion of flow from the fill is proposed <br />at this time for either the south side drainage from the fill or the northeast drainage from the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.