My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-05-01_REPORT - C1981041
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981041
>
2009-05-01_REPORT - C1981041
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:46:04 PM
Creation date
5/4/2009 11:19:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
5/1/2009
Doc Name
2008 ARR 2008 Revegetation Evaluation Report
From
J.E. Stover & Associates
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Email Name
MPB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2006). Dominant taxa were cheatgrass, forage kochia, greasewood, shadscale, and annual wheatgrass <br />(Eremopryum triticeum), with 25.8%, 14.1%, 9.8%, 6.1%, and 6.0% average cover, respectively. <br />This unit passes the revegetation success criterion of 90% of the Greasewood Reference Area value <br />when both annual and perennial cover values are combined (Table 1). It also passes when only <br />perennial cover is compared. <br />The Roadside North Portal Facilities area currently passes only two of the four diversity standards. <br />There is sufficient cover of perennial forbs or sub-shrubs to pass the required minimum values, and there <br />are no planted species with greater than 70% relative cover. However, the present relative cover of <br />perennial warm-season grasses (1.5%) and perennial cool-season grasses (0%) is insufficient to pass the <br />required minimum values (2.0% and 0.5%, respectively). This unit has shown improvement, however, <br />from the last sampling effort in 2006, when the relative cover of perennial, warm-season grasses was <br />0%. <br />Qualitative analysis indicates the revegetation at the Roadside North Portal Facilities is in average <br />condition overall. This area exhibits a diverse shrub population, with most individuals appearing robust <br />and healthy. There is little diversity in the understory, however, due to prevalence of cheatgrass. <br />3.6 2 West Portal - East <br />Ground cover of 2 West Portal - East area consisted of 25.9% live vegetation, 34.2% rock, 8.6% <br />litter, and bare soil exposure of 31.3% (Table 3b). Perennial cover across the unit averaged 13.9% (up <br />from 12.1% in 2006) with annual and biennial cover averaging 12.0% (up from 9.5% in 2006). <br />Dominant taxa were cheatgrass, rubber rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus nauseosus), and shadscale with <br />11.6%, 4.3%, and 3.4% average cover, respectively. <br />This unit fails the revegetation success criterion of 90% of the Shadscale Reference Area value when <br />both annual and perennial cover values are combined. However, it passes when only perennial cover is <br />compared (Table 1). <br />The 2 West Portal - East area currently passes all four diversity standards. The present relative <br />cover of perennial warm-season grasses, perennial forbs or sub-shrubs and perennial cool-season grasses <br />is sufficient to pass the required minimum values, and there are no planted species with greater than <br />70% relative cover. <br />Qualitative analysis indicates that this revegetation is in average to good condition overall. The <br />growth medium in this unit consists of mainly rocky material with some topsoil. Consequently, the <br />CEDAR CREEK ASSOCIATES, Inc. Page 19 Snowcap Coal Co. - 2008 <br />Revegetation Evaluation
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.