Laserfiche WebLink
i reached. It is estimated to take approximately 50 years for ECOSA to reach field <br />capacity and begin flow of infiltrated water. The expected rate of flow from <br />ECOSA after that time is expected to be approximately 23 gpm. Based on the <br />expected flow rate, existing neutralizing capabilities of the ECOSA rock, and the <br />oxygen limiting capabilities of the low permeability cover, flow from the ECOSA <br />is expected to be of similar water quality as the regional ground water table <br />exiting the Carlton Tunnel. Appendix 6, Volume IV provides a complete <br />discussion of the expected performance of the ECOSA low permeability <br />construction design. <br />Surface Water Management <br />CC&V, through their consultant Steffens and Associates, has evaluated the final <br />configuration for the ECOSA and designed a surface water management system <br />to route flows and control sediment transport and erosion during construction <br />through completion of reclamation. This system is discussed in Section 9 of this <br />Project Description and Appendix 10, Volume VII. <br />The surface water management system for final configuration of the ECOSA uses <br />• the same criteria as outlined above in subsection 5.7.1 for the SGOSA Extension. <br />Diversion and conveyance structures are designed to route flows from the 100- <br />year, 24-hour precipitation event. These flows are directed to detention basins, <br />with the most downgradient structures designed to contain twice the 10-year, 24- <br />hour precipitation event. <br />Stability <br />The geotechnical stability analysis of the ECOSA was conducted in a manner <br />consistent with that of previously approved documents and with the SGOSA <br />Extension discussed above. In summary, this analysis used a peak ground <br />acceleration of 0.08 g for the pseudo-static analysis. Other input parameters <br />remain the same as those used in other analyses and were derived from field <br />examinations, laboratory tests, use of accepted numerical assumptions for certain <br />rock types, and the proposed dimensions of the overburden fill during placement <br />and upon regrading. FOS for the ECOSA were derived for both static and pseudo- <br />static conditions. The stability was analyzed for post-reclamation conditions and <br />the results indicate that the minimum static FOS was equal to or exceeded 1.8 and <br />the minimum pseudo-static FOS exceeded 1.5. For additional details on the <br />• stability analysis for the ECOSA please refer to Appendix 7, Volume IV. <br />Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company <br />Cresson Project Mine Life Extension <br />5-19