My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REPORT - 4/15/2009, 9:43:46 AM-JWD
DRMS
>
Public
>
REPORT - 4/15/2009, 9:43:46 AM-JWD
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:57:43 AM
Creation date
4/15/2009 2:11:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
P2009012
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
4/8/2009
Doc Name
Site Characterization Report
From
R2 Incorporated
To
DRMS
Email Name
ACS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fifty-five samples were analyzed for Uranium, Ra 226, gross alpha, and gross beta. <br />Additionally, ten percent of the samples were analyzed for thorium (Th) 230 and lead (Pb) 210. <br />2.6 Subsurface Soil <br />To obtain a radiological profile of subsurface soils in the project areas, RG 4.14 suggests <br />subsurface soil samples be obtained at the center of operations and at 750 meters in four cardinal <br />compass directions and three samples should be obtained at each location one time, prior to <br />construction, to a depth of one meter. In addition, NRC's NUREG 1569 suggests that a general <br />description of the site soils and their properties be provided to support an evaluation of the <br />environmental effects of potential construction and operation erosion. <br />Twenty-one soil profiles were collected at the locations shown in Plates 1 and 2. To locate the <br />samples, a virtual axis was constructed through a plan view of the ore bodies, around which a <br />grid was drawn 750 m from the axis. The number of sample locations in each 750 m radius of <br />the traditional circular/polar grid was used to establish a basis of sample location density <br />(m2/sample) for each radial segment. It was then translated mathematically to an equivalent <br />sample location density for the grid around the axis. The resultant number of samples per <br />segment was then used to determine spacing of samples along the perimeters of each grid <br />segment and along the central axis. Finally, in consultation with CDPHE, sample density was <br />increased at ore body locations and decreased in area away from the orebodies. <br />Sample locations were established via a hand-held GPS unit. At each location, a profile was <br />obtained by collecting three soil samples at the following depth intervals: <br />• 0-30 cm <br />• 30-60 cm <br />• 60-100 cm or at refusal <br />The samples were shipped in glass containers within an ice chest with packing materials to guard <br />against breakage. Samples were shipped via overnight delivery with proper chain of custody to <br />ELI for analysis. The samples were analyzed for the parameters listed in Table 2.4. <br />2.7 Direct Radiation Measurements <br />RG 4.14 suggests direct radiation measurements be obtained at 150 m intervals out to 1,500 m in <br />eight cardinal compass directions from the center of the milling area, plus at air particulate <br />stations one time to determine average exposure rate. A program was designed which utilized <br />GPS-based scanning technologies capable of providing much higher measurement density and <br />more uniform gamma measurements over large areas. <br />April 2009 11 Site Characterization Plan
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.