My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-02-09_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981022 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981022
>
2009-02-09_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981022 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2020 7:47:49 AM
Creation date
4/14/2009 9:46:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
2/9/2009
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for RN5
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C-1981-022 <br />RN-05 Findings <br />February 2009 <br />surface water. <br />Effects on Groundwater <br />Mining of the Elk Creek Mine will have some impact the groundwater regime within <br />the immediate area of the proposed operation, but, as with the Somerset and Sanborn <br />Creek Mines, the impact will not cause material damage to the ground water regime. <br />Though the Sanborn Creek operation mined both the B and C seams that had been <br />mined before at the old Somerset Mine, the Sanborn Creek Mine was not connected to <br />the old workings and was protected by a 100-foot buffer. The old Somerset mine is <br />thought to be flooded and that buffer was apparently successful in protecting the newer <br />operation from inundation from the old workings. The 100-foot buffer was maintained <br />by advance drilling to find the location of the old workings. <br />Mine water inflow into the Sanborn Creek workings is estimated to be 425 gpm or less. <br />The old Somerset Mine had an inflow rate of 0.15667 gpm/acre for the 1,500 acres of <br />development in the mine that was below the level of the North Fork River. Projecting <br />this rate to the 2,600 acres of the Sanborn Tracts yields an inflow of 407 gpm. The <br />operator has rounded this figure to 425 gpm in the permit document. It is not known at <br />the time of this findings document what the source of the mine inflow water was during <br />the spontaneous combustion problem in 1999. The operator has also projected an <br />additional 235 gpm discharge from the old Somerset Mine, which might reach the North <br />Fork via the alluvial system. This is considered to be extremely unlikely; however, the <br />projection is used in the CHIS to allow for absolute worst-case prediction. The <br />following are potential sources for inflow: <br />1. The North Fork of the Gunnison River is 750 feet to the south and 100 feet above <br />the proposed B-seam workings and 40 feet above the C-seam workings. <br />Groundwater is expected to travel down dip from the river through the coal and <br />overburden into the mine workings. Because of the low permeability of the coal <br />and overburden, calculations have shown that these flows should be minor. The <br />flows can be expected to occur with a considerable lag time. There will be a <br />comparable diminution of flow in the North Fork but mine pumpage will return <br />this amount to the river, minus that used in the mine. The cone of depression from <br />dewatering of the strata will only extend to the boundary of the North Fork and <br />will not adversely impact any wells. <br />2. The potential exists that the mine may encounter water inflow from faults and <br />fractures. No particular faults have been identified. The largest fault that the old <br />Somerset Mine encountered had a sustained inflow of 120 gpm, which contributed <br />50 percent of the total inflow. <br />23
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.