My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-04-08_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2008086
>
2009-04-08_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2008086
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:45:18 PM
Creation date
4/9/2009 1:24:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2008086
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
4/8/2009
Doc Name
Comment Letter (Missing Pages)
From
Earthjustice
To
DRMS
Email Name
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Letter to Mr. Cattany re: CAM-Colorado Permit Application C2008086 Page 3 <br />April 7, 2009 <br />(b) The applicant has demonstrated that surface coal mining and reclamation <br />operations, as required by the Act and these Rules can be feasibly <br />accomplished under the mining and reclamation operations plan contained in <br />the application. <br />Colorado MLRB Regulations for Coal Mining § 2.07.06(2) (emphasis added). However, coal <br />mining cannot be feasibly accomplished as described in CAM-Colorado's permit application <br />because no mining can safely occur unless MDWs remove methane from the mine. <br />Further, the application is incomplete because it fails to completely describe surface impacts <br />from MDWs, the well pads that must be bulldozed for them, and the access roads to the MDW <br />sites. DRMS rules require disclosure of such impacts: <br />Each.application shall contain a detailed description of the specific mining <br />operations proposed to be conducted within the permit area. This description <br />shall include, at a minimum, the following: [...] <br />(3) Mine facilities. <br />(a) A description, plans, and drawings, describing the location, construction, <br />modification, use, maintenance and removal of mine support facilities in the <br />permit area including all buildings, structures, utility corridors and other <br />support facilities including but not limited to those listed in 4.04. Plans and <br />drawings shall include a map, to meet the standards prescribed in 2. 10, <br />appropriate cross sections, design drawings, and specifications sufficient to <br />demonstrate compliance with 4.04. [.... ] <br />(c) A description of each road conveyor, or rail system to be constructed, <br />used or maintained within the proposed permit area. The description shall <br />include a map, prepared in accordance with 2. 10, [and] appropriate cross <br />sections [etc.] <br />Id. at § 2.05.3 (emphasis added). Despite BLM's conclusion that MDWs are part of the Red <br />Cliff Mine's "'proposed action," DEIS at 2-20, the application contains no description or map of <br />MDWs or the roads to be "constructed, used or maintained" to access them. <br />It is important for CAM-Colorado to fully disclose the nature and extent of surface disturbance, <br />since DRMS must determine an adequate bond for such disturbance and since DRMS must <br />ensure that the surface impacts can be fully reclaimed. See, e.g_, id. at § 3.02.2 (requiring <br />applicant post a bond "sufficient to assure the completion of the reclamation plan if the work had <br />to be performed by the Board"); id. at § 4.04 (requiring that mine support and transportation <br />facilities "be designed, constructed or reconstructed, and maintained, and the area restored" to <br />protect wildlife, water quality, and other resources). <br />DRMS therefore must reverse its finding that permit application C2008086 is complete and <br />require CAM-Colorado to provide additional information to the agency concerning MDWs, well
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.