My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-04-01_REPORT - C1980005 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1980005
>
2009-04-01_REPORT - C1980005 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:45:02 PM
Creation date
4/1/2009 3:40:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
4/1/2009
Doc Name
2008 Annual Revegetation Monitoring Report
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Reveg Monitoring Report
Email Name
DTM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• native species encountered in the sixteen 100 sq. m. (2m x 50 m) samples of the 2006 <br />reclamation was 50.3he total number of native species found in the 2001 reclamation was lower <br />than the average species density of the Mountain Brush Reference area (35.3 species per 100 <br />sq.m.) but higher than the Sagebrush Reference Area (28.2 species per 100 sq.m.). The total <br />number of native species found in the 2006 reclamation was substantially higher than the <br />average species density of both the Mountain Brush Reference area and Sagebrush Reference <br />Area. Note that the relatively low number of native species in the 2001 reclamation is most likely <br />due to the very low number of samples (three because the 2001 area is so small) and would likely <br />increase with an increase in number of samples, as would be required for formal bond release <br />testing. Hence Alternative Test D) is failed for the 2001 reclamation and passed for the <br />2006 reclamation. <br />In summary for the 2001 Reclamation, Mandatory Test A) was passed as were Alternative Tests <br />B) and C) and hence the species diversity test as a whole is passed. Test D) was barely failed <br />(relating mostly to the very small area being tested), but inasmuch as the permit requirement <br />would necessitate passing A) plus two of the other three, the 2001 Reclamation also as a whole <br />passes the species diversity test. For the 2006 Reclamation, Mandatory Test A) was passed as <br />were Alternative Tests B), C) and D). <br />• <br />• 16
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.