My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-03-02_PERMIT FILE - C1980004 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1980004
>
2009-03-02_PERMIT FILE - C1980004 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:44:00 PM
Creation date
3/31/2009 2:27:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/2/2009
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix R Stability Evaluation of Proposed Gob Wastepile
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 5. Summary of Stability Evaluations <br />Critical Factor of SafetyZ <br />Cross Total Stress Effective Stress <br />Section' Analysis Analysis <br />2.87 (circular) 1.74 (circular) <br />Section A-A' 3.03 (block) 2.10 (block) <br />2.86 (circular)3 1.74 ~(circular)3 <br />2.63 (circular) 1.74 (circular) <br />Section B-B' 2.76 (block) 1.~6 (block) <br />2.41 (circular)3 1.74 ~(~circular)3 <br />Notes• <br />1. Cross section locations indicated on Drawing 3. <br />2. Factor of safety by Spencers procedure. <br />3. Considering shallow groundwater table (5-foot depth) <br />5.4 Sensitivity Analyses <br />Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the effects of variability of material properties. <br />The sensitivity analyses were conducted for critical total and effecijive stress analyses (i.e., <br />circular failures for Cross Section B-B~. Sensitivity of six parameters was evaluated, including <br />unit weight of gob for total and effective stress analyses, undrained shear strength of gob (total <br />stress analysis), angle of internal friction (~~ of gob, and angle of internal friction of native soils <br />for both total and effective stress analyses. These parameters were varied plus/minus 20% of <br />the values indicated in Table 4 and discussed in Section 5.2. The Factor of safety was plotted <br />as a function of these variable unit weight and strength parameters.. These plots are presented <br />in Appendix D.3. <br />5.4.1 Total Stress Analyses <br />For the total stress analyses, sensitivity analyses included unit weight of gob, undrained shear <br />strength of gob, and internal friction angle of native silty sand. The factor of safety decreased <br />linearly from approximately 3.0 to 2.4 for respective gob unit weights of 72 pcf to 108 pcf. <br />Considering sensitivity to gob undrained shear strength (Su), the factor of safety increased <br />linearly from approximately 2.4 to 2.85 for respective gob undrained shear strengths of <br />1,060 psf to 1,590 psf. Finally, the factor of safety increased linearly with increasing native silty <br />sand soils from approximately 2.3 (for ~=240) to 3.0 (for ~=360). <br />5.4.2 Effective Stress Analyses <br />For the effective stress analyses, sensitivity analyses included unit weight of gob and internal <br />friction angle of gob and native silty sand. Neither the unit weight of gob nor the friction angle <br />of the native soils changed the factor of safety for the effective stress analyses. <br />McClave Canyon Mine stability report <br />Project #07-334GE0 <br />Page 12 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.