My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-03-02_PERMIT FILE - C1980004A (9)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1980004
>
2009-03-02_PERMIT FILE - C1980004A (9)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2017 8:40:10 AM
Creation date
3/31/2009 1:23:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/2/2009
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix N Probable Hydrologic Consequences
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table N-1 <br />• PHC East Salt (2003-2007) Creek SW-1 <br />Conductivity <br />Irrigation <br />Season Increase Decrease <br />2003 -5.1 <br />2004 -18.4% <br />2005 0.24% <br />2006 -7.09% <br />2007 -9.24% <br />5-Year mass <br />balance -8.2% <br />The comibed discharge generally improves the conductivity of East Salt Creek surface <br />waters. However, in 2005 there was a slight increase, but the 0.2% increase is nearly <br />• negligible as the increase was only 4 micromhos/cm. The mass balance for the <br />irrigation season is calculated by multiplying the flow by the conductivity and dividing by <br />the sum of flow. See Tables N-3 through N-7 for yearly mass-balances. (Mass balance <br />is for the irrigation season only). <br />The East Salt Creek Alluvium is recognized as an alluvial valley floor. Data gathered <br />over the last several water years for GW-3 demonstrates the combined discharge has <br />not had a negative impact on the alluvial groundwater. As shown below, nearly all <br />conductivity data recorded falls between the GW-3 baseline and the combined water <br />average conductivity reference line. Since nearly all the data points fall below the <br />baseline for GW-3, it is not likely the combined discharge has increased the <br />conductivity of the alluvial groundwater. The combined discharge could only lower the <br />conductivity of the alluvial groundwater since the conductivity of the combined <br />discharge is less than the conductivity of GW-3. The situation is the same at all of the <br />groundwater monitoring wells. The baseline conductivity of all of the GW wells exceeds <br />the average conductivity of the water discharged from the mine and gob pile. Therefore, <br />the conductivity of the alluvial groundwater can only be improved by the combined <br />discharge. The most recent data gathered for GW-9 located immediately down <br />gradient of the gob pile, is shown below. As concluded with GW-3, it is likely the <br />comk~ined water discharge will only improve the conductivity of the alluvial groundwater. <br /> <br />Appendix N - TR-16 - 4 - 10/08 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.