My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_INSPECTION - C1981010 (61)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
_INSPECTION - C1981010 (61)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2020 5:06:59 AM
Creation date
3/30/2009 12:34:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Name
Inspection Report
Inspection Date
3/24/2009
Email Name
JDM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III. COMMENTS - COMPLIANCE <br /> Below are comments on the inspection. The comments include discussion of observations made <br /> during the inspection. Comments also describe any enforcement actions taken during the inspection <br /> and the facts or evidence supporting the enforcement action. <br /> This was a complete coal inspection conducted by Jason Musick of the Colorado Division of <br /> Reclamation, Mining, and Safety(Division)on 24 March 2009. The weather was cloudy and snowing <br /> during the on-the-ground inspection of the site. Forrest Luke of TMI accompanied the inspection. The <br /> ground was wet and snow covered at the time of the inspection. <br /> Trapper continues to progress with mining in the F-Pit and Z-Pit. <br /> During the inspection, additional maps previously submitted with the PR-06 application were <br /> requested. Maps M4, M6, M10A, M10B, and M12 were provided. <br /> Availability of Records <br /> See attached DRMS Availability of Records. All records were inspected at the Trapper Mine site. <br /> Signs and Markers <br /> Mine ID and Blasting signs were displayed in the locations required. All required information was <br /> properly displayed at the time of the inspection. Topsoil markers and Permit Boundary markers <br /> inspected are delineated with a piece of PVC pipe attached to a T-post with either a P for permit <br /> boundary or T for topsoil. The topsoil markers and permit boundary markers observed were in good <br /> condition and displayed in the appropriate locations. All signs and markers were in compliance with <br /> Rules 4.02.2, 4.02.6(3) and 4.02.7 at the time of the inspection. <br /> Roads <br /> All haul roads were wet and/or snow covered at the time of the inspection. All haul road side ditches <br /> were functioning as permitted at the time of the inspection. Adequate runoff was noted with no signs <br /> of damage or erosion. Access roads were snow covered and wet with limited access. Side ditches <br /> were snow covered. All access roads appeared to be stable with no damage noted with the exception <br /> of the following: <br /> • The west side of the middle flume pond access road and the junction where the three access <br /> roads converge was extremely rutted at the time of the inspection. When weather permits, <br /> these access roads will require grading in order to provide adequate runoff from the road. <br /> Hydrologic Balance <br /> Ponds were being monitored by Forrest Luke of TMI during this inspection. Four ponds were <br /> discharging during the inspection. <br /> • No Name appeared stable with no problems noted. No Name contained water and had a <br /> discharge rate of .18. <br /> • Middle Flume contained water and was discharging through the 1" Baski flume at .30 and pH <br /> at 8.6. <br /> • Johnson contained water with discharge at .10 and pH at 8.4 and 3410 conductivity. <br /> • East Pyeatt was discharging at the combined monitoring point at 0.58 with a pH of 7.8. The <br /> spring at East Pyeatt had a discharge of 0.3 through the 1" Baski flume. <br /> All pond embankments were snow covered and stable with no problems noted at the time of the <br /> inspection. All spillways were in compliance at the time of the inspection. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.