My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-03-27_REPORT - C1981019 (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2009-03-27_REPORT - C1981019 (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:44:48 PM
Creation date
3/27/2009 2:58:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
3/27/2009
Doc Name
2008 AHR & ARR Exhibit 9A
From
Colowyo Coal Company
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2008
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.0 RESULTS <br />2.1 Overall Summary <br />Overall, a total of 68 plant species were observed within the 7 revegetated areas, whereas 49 plant <br />species were observed in the 2 reference areas evaluated in 2008. These consisted of 24 grass taxa, 35 <br />forbs, 0 sub-shrubs, and 9 shrubs in the revegetation and 15 grass taxa, 23 forbs, 4 sub-shrubs, and 7 <br />shrubs in the reference areas (see Table AB-1 in Appendix AB). Table AB-1 indicates all taxa observed <br />during fieldwork and is the only table that indicates 1) common names, 2) historic scientific <br />nomenclature, and 3) most current taxonomic nomenclature. Remaining tables do not indicate this latter <br />category. On average, 33 unique plant species are observable in any given revegetation unit and 33 in <br />the references areas as well. Among these taxa are an occasional noxious or invasive weed such as <br />musk thistle or Japanese brome (and/or cheatgrass), with the latter occasionally existing as more notable <br />patches. <br />In 2008, there were no units in year two or year four, therefore all units monitored exhibited 7 or <br />more growing seasons with one unit in its first growing season. An analysis of the ground cover variable <br />(Chart 3) indicated that five of the six areas of older reclamation (7 or more years of age) exceed the <br />success criterion based on 2008 reference area values. One unit in west pit (WP010) does not pass the <br />2008 standard. On the other hand, Table 1 and Chart 4 indicate success with regard to production on all <br />six of the revegetated units that are 7 or more years of age. With regard to diversity, Colowyo's <br />revegetation efforts appear to be reasonable as indicated on Table 3 and Chart 6. Diversity tends to <br />increase with the age of reclamation and in most cases should be sufficient for bond release testing by <br />the time they are of sufficient age for such testing (years 9 and 10 of the bond responsibility period). As <br />indicated on Chart 6, four of the six areas monitored in 2008 would pass such testing. Failures are a <br />result of reclamation not exhibiting a dominant perennial forb. However, such failures may simply be due <br />to random sampling error (i.e. sample placement). This analysis suggests that Colowyo is in a <br />reasonable position with regard to the diversity variable. <br />Contrary to the aforementioned three variables, woody plant density at Colowyo remains somewhat <br />problematic and will continue to do so until new reclamation metrics pursuant to TR-72 are implemented. <br />Perusal of Chart 5 and Table 2 in comparison to the current success standard of 1000 stems per acre <br />reveals that all monitored areas fall short (when considering density on a unit average basis). As stated <br />in the 2003 report, it is Cedar Creek's recommendation that Colowyo continue to pursue a program of <br />modification (TR-72). This program provides several avenues for correction of the woody plant density <br />Rio Tinto Energy America/Colowyo Mine Page 5 Revegetation Monitoring - 2008
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.