Laserfiche WebLink
e_ . - <br />that, for use in the ensuing consultation, CAM conducts a significantly more thorough <br />investigation as to how the groundwater and surface water is affected by their other mining <br />operations in the area, and into how the operation of the Red Cliff mine in conjunction with the <br />other mines would cumulatively affect ground and surface water quality. <br />Another concern regarding this project is potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles. We <br />recommend that this project follow the guidelines included in the Recommended Buffer Zones <br />and Seasonal Restrictions for Colorado Raptors, in order to avoid potential Migratory Bird <br />Treaty Act (MBTA) violations with regard to raptors. The DEIS section 3-133 identifies nests of <br />a golden eagle, a red-tailed hawk, and 2 northern harriers in or adjacent to the project area. The <br />CDOW guidelines recommend no surface occupancy within'/4 mile of golden eagle nests, and no <br />human disturbance within 1/z mile of an active nest from Dec. 15 through July 15. With regard to <br />red-tailed hawk nests, the recommendation is for no surface occupancy to occur within V3 mile <br />for the entire year. There are no specific recommendations for northern harriers so we suggest <br />the standard 1/4 mile buffer for no surface occupancy during the period of nest occupation through <br />1 month after fledging of young be observed. The DEIS pages 4-133 and 4-134 disclose that the <br />conveyor and haul road would be located less-than-0.25 mile from- -.the-golden-eagle-nest, and-less <br />than 0.33 mile from the red-tailed hawk nest. As proposed, construction activities would be <br />initiated when the nests are inactive, but would not stop if the eagles or hawks subsequently <br />occupy the nests. The DEIS further discloses that these sites may no longer be used for nesting <br />during the construction period and after the mine portal and associated surface facilities are <br />constructed. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) of 1940, as amended, 16 <br />U.S.C. 688 et seq., prohibits knowingly taking, or taking with wanton disregard for the <br />consequences of an activity, any bald or golden eagles or their body parts, nests, or eggs, which <br />includes collection, molestation, disturbance, or killing activities. The discontinued use of the <br />golden eagle nest as a result of this project would be considered take of the nest and is <br />prohibited under the Bald Eagle Protection Act without a permit. <br />Several sedimentation ponds and a sewage treatment plant are proposed actions with this project. <br />The DEIS is unclear as to the quality of the water expected to reside in these ponds. If the ponds <br />are expected to contain stormwater runoff from the coal waste-rock pile, encountered <br />groundwater, sewage plant discharge, or other waters potentially exceeding Colorado aquatic life <br />water quality standards, contaminated surface water could pose a hazard to migratory birds. The <br />Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 United States Code Sections 703 707, prohibits any "take" of <br />migratory birds. Operators should always ensure that no surface oil is present on pits, tanks, <br />places the company at risk of violating the MBTA should migratory bird mortalities occur. To <br />prevent violations of the MBTA, CAM should be proactive and construct barriers, such as <br />netting pits, to ensure that migratory birds do not come in contact with hazardous materials. The <br />Service provides further information on our web site at: <br />http://mountain-prairie.fws.gov/contaminants/oilpits.htm. <br />This project includes the construction of electricity transmission lines. The DEIS is inadequate <br />in its addressing of wildlife concerns with regard to the power lines. The DEIS -states that <br />biological surveys have not been completed for this portion of the project.. We expect that this <br />will be rectified and that appropriate minimization measures will be imparted to protect the <br />biological resources discovered in the surveys, prior to issuance of a final EIS. At the very least, <br />in areas of known migration corridors, wetlands and known nesting trees, power lines should be