Laserfiche WebLink
' Petroleum impacts did spread laterally into the surrounding soils ranging from <br />approximately 3 to 12 feet from the centerline of the SWE. Soil conditions were highly <br />' variable but generally consisted of silty and sandy clay from the ground surface to 6 to 8 <br />feet bgs. Fine sands ranging to poorly sorted and gravel was present at depths ranging <br />from 6 to 12 feet bgs. Much of the upper ground surface was frozen at the time of the <br />excavation but this material was generally not impacted by gasoline. However, if surface <br />' material that was encountered appeared to be contaminated, it was removed for off-site <br />disposal. <br />' The SWE was backfilled by using clean soil from the northern portion of the site within <br />one week of completion of the excavation. The soil was compacted to 95% proctor in <br />preparation of re-excavating the slurry wall trench to prevent caving. <br />' 4.2 Slurry Holding Trench Excavation - (February 13-20, 2007) <br />Based on the initial sampling and laboratory analysis of the material in the "slurry holding <br />' trench" (SHT), this material was determined to be characteristically hazardous at that <br />time. In the ICAP, E-21 proposed to handle this material as a characteristically <br />hazardous waste. Based on meetings, teleconferences and email correspondence, the <br />' addition of cement as an absorbent was approved by the CDPHE to assist in stabilizing <br />the slurry mud in-place in an effort to make it a consistency that was possible to safely <br />handle and remove. This was performed from approximately January 11, 2007 to <br />February 2, 2007. A photolog of site activities for work performed on February 2, 2007 is <br />' included in Appendix 3. <br />After all the material in the SHT was handled, E-21 resampled the SHT material for <br />' waste characterization. Based on the lab results, none of the samples exceeded the <br />benzene TCLP limit of 0.5 mg/I or 10 mg/Kg for benzene. The results of this sampling <br />are summarized on Table 2B. The laboratory analytical report is included in Appendix 4. <br />' The analysis was submitted to CDPHE and excavation and disposal of this material was <br />scheduled to begin on February 13, 2007 following conditional approval by CDPHE as <br />discussed in the February 6, 2007 email. <br />On February 13, 2007, E-21 and GeoCon personnel initiated excavation and disposal of <br />the material in the SHT. As discussed in the original ICAP, the slurry and some <br />impacted sidewall soils were stabilized using cement. Post-stabilization BTEX and TCLP <br />' analysis indicated that the material was not characteristically hazardous and was <br />acceptable for disposal at a properly licensed solid waste landfill disposal facility. A <br />photolog of excavation work during this period is included in Appendix 3. <br />' The soils were excavated using a track hoe operated by GeoCon personnel. Excavation <br />of impacted material extended from station marker (sm) 19+00 to 22+90. As soil was <br />excavated, the material in the track hoe bucket was screened for proper disposal <br />' determination using a calibrated PID to determine qualitative concentrations of <br />petroleum hydrocarbons. Visual and olfactoral observations were also used to <br />determine relative petroleum hydrocarbon impacts. Measurements were recorded in <br />' approximately 10 to 25-foot intervals along the length of the excavation. <br />In general, if PID measurements exceeded 100 parts per million (ppm) and/or petroleum <br />' impacts were evident by sight or smell, the soil was loaded directly into dump trucks for <br />transport under special waste manifest to the Allied Waste Landfill at 8480 Tower Road <br />in Commerce City, Colorado. When soil was encountered that did not appear <br />contaminated by hydrocarbons based on PID measurements or sight and smell <br />3