My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-03-05_REVISION - M1997054 (23)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1997054
>
2008-03-05_REVISION - M1997054 (23)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:18:55 PM
Creation date
3/18/2009 4:18:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1997054
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/5/2008
Doc Name
Exhibit IV.8- Slope Stability Report
From
Civil Resources, LLC
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i7 <br />1 Design Analysis and Criteria <br />The proposed mining and reclamation slopes were analyzed using the XSTABLE V5.208 DOS <br />computer program. XSTABLE was designed to analyze the slope stability of an earth <br />embankment subjected to several critical situations that may occur during the life of the <br />embankment. Two cases dictated by the State Engineer were investigated: a steady state case <br />and a rapid draw down case. Case 1: Assumes the embankment is in a steady state scenario; the <br />' required factor of safety 1.5. Case 2: Assumes the embankment is in a rapid draw down state; <br />the required factor of safety is 1.2. For the mining conditions, the scenario of maximum <br />highwall dewatering was the only scenario analyzed. <br />Methodology <br />' The Bishop method was used in the computer analysis for determining the safety factors. The <br />procedure utilizes a critical failure surface searching method to generate circular surfaces. The <br />program automatically searches for the lowest factor of safety. 600-1200 separate failure <br />surfaces were analyzed for each case. The same process was used in determining the safety <br />factor for each case. For the given soil parameters, the factor of safety was determined. The <br />' cohesion and friction angle of the granite fines were then varied to determine the soil properties <br />of the minimum allowable safety factor. <br />' The mining embankment configuration shown in the computer analysis represents the estimated <br />conditions for this site. If the mining conditions differ significantly from the estimated <br />conditions, the slope stability will need to be reevaluated on a case by case basis. The mining <br />highwall was found to be stable and well above the factor of safety. <br />The reclamation embankment analysis illustrates the slope failures consist of minor sloughing <br />r failures indicative of erosion and maintenance requirements. The attached results show the <br />failure slopes and the associated property values and safety factor. The resulting property values <br />1 are conservative for anticipated site conditions. <br />Slope Stability Results <br />' The minimum safety factors required are 1.2 for the rapid draw down condition and 1.5 for <br />steady state. This design criteria was used to establish the desired minimum safety factors for this <br />project and should be considered conservative for evaluating reclaimed slopes against alluvial <br />mining high walls. The calculated factors of safety are within the design criteria specified for this <br />project and can be considered indicators of high wall performances under the various conditions. <br />The results of the slope stability analysis are presented in Table 2. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.