My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-03-05_REVISION - M1997054 (24)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1997054
>
2008-03-05_REVISION - M1997054 (24)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:18:55 PM
Creation date
3/18/2009 4:08:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1997054
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/5/2008
Doc Name
Extension Request
From
Civil Resources, LLC
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Id1f°J8 15:32.3b FkfJkA Tuad Gnmar lU Mnch ,vbort <br />immediate Project area. <br />Water chemistry of the bedrock aquifers is distinct from surface and outwash aquifer waters. Water <br />from the Depot. Clark. Wooten and northwest wells has markedly greater TDS concentrations, plus a <br />shift in water type toward calcium-sodium sulfate. <br />Given the presence of sulfates and organic carbons in shaley and limey bedrock aquifers such as the <br />Niobrara, Carlisle or Greenhorn Formations, plus the natural occurrence of sulfate-reducing bacteria, <br />hydrogen sulfide (gas having a rotten egg odor) can be naturally formed in these aquifers and <br />produced from springs and wells. <br />No reports of hydrogen sulfide are known in the immediate area of the project, north of the Arkansas <br />River. South of the River, where several wells develop water supplies from the Niobrara, Carlisle or <br />Greenhorn Formations, hydrogen sulfide odors may readily, and naturally, occur. Such occurrences <br />can be seasonal in response to water level and nutrient availability changes, or may be episodic due to: <br />? longer-period climatic changes, <br />? changes in net water withdrawals, and/or <br />? local recharge of nutrient- and carbon-rich water from leach fields, pastures or feedlots. <br />These occurrences have no cause-and-effect relationship to the Project. <br />Conclusions <br />(1) The impact of the Project will be to increase the water table elevation beneath the plant area. <br />This may also be reflected in the Dakota Group underlying the plant area, with its water table <br />or potentiometrie head increasing somewhat (2 to 5 feet), with lesser rises away from the plant. <br />Slightly greater spring and seep flows may also result. <br />(2) The increased water table elevation in the outwash aquifer will be more than offset by <br />removing irrigation from the hayfields and pastures of the adjacent ranch. This change would <br />' occur at the direction of the Division of Water Resources, as the result of its administration of <br />junior water rights. This may lower the water table sufficiently to reduce spring flows at the <br />river and adversely affect downgradient springs or wells. <br />(3) The possible increases in potentiometric head or water table in the Dakota Group could be <br />manifested as somewhat greater bedrock spring discharge rates to the Arkansas River, if DWR <br />does not administer the junior irrigation rights. If irrigation is stopped, a decline in bedrock <br />spring flows may occur. <br />(4) Hydraulic impacts to the Dakota Group and other bedrock aquifers cannot be expected to <br />occur south of the River, as the River serves as a hydraulic boundary having nearly constant- <br />head conditions. Furthermore, faults to the southwest, south, southeast and east of the Project <br />create structural blocks that will be hydraulically separate bedrock units. <br />(5) Changes in bedrock well production or water quality (including hydrogen sulfide presence) in <br />areas south of the River, and in wells producing water from bedrock aquifers structurally <br />isolated from the Project, will be due to natural or other non-Projev-t related factors. <br />kydrogeologyReport-Parkdale Project Page 4 of 4 <br /> <br />S OF a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.