My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-03-16_REVISION - C1981028 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981028
>
2009-03-16_REVISION - C1981028 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:44:26 PM
Creation date
3/17/2009 11:27:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/16/2009
Doc Name
Bond Release Application
From
Savage & Savage
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SL4
Email Name
JHB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cover sampling identified three lifeforms and 22 species within the 1995 and 1997 <br />40 reclamation areas. The lifeforms included thirteen species of perennial graminoids, one <br />annual grass, two perennial forbs, one biennial forb, four annual forbs, and one succulent. Of <br />the species encountered on the 1995 and 1997 reclamation areas, sixteen were native and six <br />were introduced. Perennial species outnumbered annual species by sixteen to five, with one <br />biennial species. Warm season graminoid and forb species were more prevalent than cool <br />season species (11 warm season to 10 cool season) in the 1995 and 1997 reclamation areas. <br />Warm season graminoid species accounted for nine species and cool season grass species <br />included five species. Five forb species were identified as cool season and two were warm <br />season. The succulent was evergreen. <br />The 1995 and 1997 reclamation areas had seven species contributing greater than three <br />percent relative cover this year. These species included Calamovilfa longifolia (19.14% <br />percent relative cover), Bromus marginatus and Sporobolus cryptandrus (18.60 percent <br />relative cover each), Bouteloua gracilis (11.45%), Bouteloua curtipendula (7.16%), <br />Agropyron smithii (6.44%), and Ambrosia psilostachya (3.94%). <br />3.3 COMPARISON OF RECLAMATION AREAS WITH FINAL REVEGETATION <br />SUCCESS CRITERIA <br />Comparison of the reclaimed area values for vegetation cover, herbaceous production, and <br />species composition with the final revegetation success criteria, indicates whether <br />revegetation has been successful, or whether additional measures need to be initiated to <br />• enhance vegetation community development. The tables below allow the comparison of the <br />parameter values with the standard to be achieved, either from the predictive equations in the <br />case of total vegetation cover (y=0.0173x3-0.8592x2+14.562x-47.01 S) and total herbaceous <br />production (v=0.3749x2.24ss), or the established standard for species composition. <br />Total Vegetation Cover (2008) <br />Predictive Equation Value for 2008: 23.13% total vegetation cover (based on 7.95" <br />precipitation value) <br />Xbar <br />S <br />1985/1986/1987 Rec. Areas 1995/1997 Rec. Areas <br />63.20% 59.20% <br />6.36 5.65 <br />N 15 15 <br />Nmin I 2 2 <br />Based on the results of the 2008 quantitative sampling, the 1985, 1986, and 1987 reclamation <br />areas and 1995 and 1997 reclamation areas significantly exceeded the predicted total cover <br />vegetation value of 23.13 percent, meeting the final revegetation success criterion for <br />vegetation cover. <br />• Total Herbaceous Production (2008) <br />Coors Energy Company Keenesburg Mine Page 12 <br />2008 Phase III Vegetation Study
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.