My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-12-11_PERMIT FILE - C1980007A (36)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2008-12-11_PERMIT FILE - C1980007A (36)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:38:50 PM
Creation date
3/16/2009 3:42:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/11/2008
Doc Name
Small Area Exemption Demonstrations
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 66 SAE
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />CONTROL PRAJCTICE FACTOR (P) <br />This factor is used to identify those soil conservation and tillage practices which affect <br />the level of sediment generated from a site (e.g., terraces, cross slope tillage, contour <br />planting). In this comparison we are interested in the sediment generated from <br />reclaimed or revegetated sites and undisturbed sites where these practices would have <br />no special impact on soil loss at this time. Therefore, for the purposes of our <br />comparison, a value of unity (one) will be assigned this factor, rendering no impact to <br />our calculations. <br />M. RESULTS <br />- --- ----- - - ----- - --- - ----- <br />USLE CALCULATIONS <br />Based on our assigned factor values, soil loss was calculated for each of the reclaimed, <br />revegetated, and undisturbed areas. Results are presented in Table 3. In each case, <br />soil loss from the reclaimed or revegetated area was calculated to be less than that <br />expected from the adjacent undisturbed area. <br />IV. CONCLUSIONS <br />The results of the USLE calculations show that the reclaimed or revegetated areas at the <br />Lone Pine Gulch Surface Facilities Area and Water Tank Site produce less sediment <br />than the adjacent undisturbed oakbrush or sagebrush areas. The calculated values from <br />the USLE comparison of undisturbed and reclaimed areas verifies what is expected in <br />this case and also what has been seen at other reclaimed sites in Colorado. Based on <br />the results of the soil loss analysis, the reclaimed and revegetated areas are eligible for <br />removal of silt fence sediment control structures. <br /> <br />-6-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.