My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-01-31_REVISION - C1981044
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981044
>
2006-01-31_REVISION - C1981044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:16:19 PM
Creation date
3/12/2009 9:15:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
1/31/2006
Doc Name
Email Regarding Adequacy Review
From
Byron Walker
To
Janet Binns
Type & Sequence
SL2
Email Name
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />Interoffice MEMORANDUM <br />to: Janet Binns <br />COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />Bill Ritter, Jr. <br />Governor <br />Harris D. Sherman <br />Executive Director <br />from: Byron G. Walker <br />Ronald W. Cattany <br />subject: Eagle Mine Complex, C-1981-044, SL-2 Adequacy Responses Division Director <br />date: January 31, 2006 Natural Resource Trustee <br />Janet, this memorandum is in response to your memorandum of 1/13/2006, same subject. I <br />believe the response from the applicant is adequate. <br />Request 15 was made to provide us with a clearer understanding of subsidence observed in the <br />area. We should be able to generate, within house, such depictions. However, in review, I do not <br />believe we have to. I found no evidence in the PAP or the request that the subsidence features <br />were not within the approved subsidence control plan (there were no specifics with regard to <br />protection of rangeland). Approved postmining land uses appear to be feasible. There was no <br />indication of material damage or requirement for restoration of renewable resource lands or <br />structures. <br />With regard to item 16, the applicant has responded that the areas being released are not affected <br />by fluctuations in the mine water. Our concern was that alternate wetting and drying of the <br />remaining coal pillars might result in collapse of more areas. <br />The applicant has indicated that subsidence has manifested itself over the area requested for <br />release. <br />All materials supplied and borrowed have been returned to you. Please see me if you have any <br />questions. <br />Cc: Dan Hernandez (w/o encl) <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.