My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-03-04_PERMIT FILE - M2008082 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2008082
>
2009-03-04_PERMIT FILE - M2008082 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:44:06 PM
Creation date
3/5/2009 1:45:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2008082
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
3/4/2009
Doc Name
Adequacy Response
From
Hart Environmental
To
DRMS
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Project 06606 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />The soils encountered at this site have varying angles of repose. The soils that <br />will control the stability of the slope are anticipated to be the sand and gravel. <br />Based on our review of the boring logs and our experience nearby, we anticipate <br />that the gravel will be very sandy, with sand to gravelly sand lenses. <br />Based on our experience in this area and reference geotechnical engineering <br />literature ("Fundamentals of Geotechnical Analysis" by I. S. Dunn, L. R. <br />Anderson and F. W. Kiefer) an anticipated conservative angle of internal friction <br />for this material is approximately 26°. This is based on the assumption that <br />dewatering will keep the face of the pit moderately dry during the period of time <br />that the pit is active. This corresponds to a slope of just over 2:1. It has been our <br />experience that the risk of instability at that slope is low. However, due to the <br />potential layering of the site soils, the sandy nature of the gravel layers and lensic <br />nature of the soils at this site, we are recommending a maximum slope of the pit <br />walls of 3:1 (3 horizontal to 1 vertical). Therefore at a maximum assumed depth <br />of mining of 33 feet, a minimum setback of 99 feet from any man made structure <br />will afford adequate protection from the risk of slope instability. <br />Waterways present a somewhat increased risk of instability due to the continued <br />presence of a source of water and the fact that it is likely that the groundwater <br />table will slope upwards toward the elevation of the water surface elevation in <br />the waterway. Therefore, we recommend that there be an offset of a minimum of <br />100 feet from the South Platte River, where no mining takes place. From that <br />point, the 3:1 slope discussed above would be applicable. <br />Thank you for consulting with us on this phase of the project. If you have any <br />questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact us. <br />Sincerely, <br />SCOTT, COX AND ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />M. Edwar assgow, PE <br />Professional Geologist
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.