My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1997-11-13_REVISION - M1977493 (50)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
1997-11-13_REVISION - M1977493 (50)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 5:41:07 PM
Creation date
3/3/2009 1:49:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
11/13/1997
Doc Name
Eagle Park reservoir- Final Reclamation Report and Analytical Summary
From
Climax Molyb
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
SR2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Woodward4lyde <br /> Mr. Bryce Romig <br /> Climax Molybdenum Company <br /> October 14, 1997 <br /> Page 3 <br /> probably less than 50 cubic yards in any given event. This type of sliding (soil slips) can be <br /> expected on about a 200 ft length of the slope near where the recent slides occurred. <br /> Elsewhere, the slope angle is less steep and the colluvium more stable. We do not believe <br /> that the potential soil slips threaten the performance of the dam or reservoir. <br /> Deep Seated Landslides <br /> We observed no indications of deep seated landsliding in the area east of the recent soil slips <br /> and believe that this slope will remain stable during the raising of the reservoir water level. <br /> However, the shear surface west of the recent soil slips may be the slip surface of an ancient <br /> landslide, or a fault trace. The shear surface orientation is constant with major joint set, as <br /> could be expected for a landslide, and with regional faulting. The striations on the surface <br /> and the local topography are consistent with what could have been a large ancient landslide. <br /> Whether it was generated by landsliding or faulting, the surface is a weakness in the reservoir <br /> • slope. <br /> The recent excavation of oxide tailing and near surface soils has changed the slope <br /> configuration and may have reduced the passive resistance at the slide toe. Thus, there is a <br /> small risk that sliding could occur on this surface as the reservoir is raised with fresh water to <br /> unprecedented levels. We do not believe that movement is likely, because there currently <br /> appears to be relatively little driving force that would cause movement. However, it would <br /> be prudent to install several observation points to monitor for slope movement, during the <br /> first reservoir filling. <br /> Recommendations for Monitoring <br /> We recommend surface monuments be installed to monitor movements during next seasons' <br /> reservoir filling. Three surface monuments should be installed near the locations shown on <br /> Figure 3. We recommend that the monuments consist of a vertical hole 4 to 6 inches in <br /> diameter drilled to a depth of 2 to 3 feet. A No. 4 steel reinforcing bar should be inserted in <br /> the hole and the hole backfilled with lean concrete or other suitable backfill material. <br /> Two to three baseline readings should be taken at each monument prior to reservoir filling <br /> The movement points should then be monitored every 2 to 3 weeks during the spring <br /> reservoir filling. If only nominal movement has been observed in the monuments after the <br /> first year of observations,the measurements should continue twice a year for the next year to <br /> . two years. If subsequent movements are not observed, observations can be suspended. <br /> - 2443539361LE2.DOC 723/97(1:50 PM)JRPT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.