My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1997-11-13_REVISION - M1977493 (50)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
1997-11-13_REVISION - M1977493 (50)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 5:41:07 PM
Creation date
3/3/2009 1:49:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
11/13/1997
Doc Name
Eagle Park reservoir- Final Reclamation Report and Analytical Summary
From
Climax Molyb
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
SR2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sulfate <br /> The water quality standard for sulfate is 250 mg/L. Sulfate was higher than 250 mg/L in the first <br /> three sampling events, however, has been below the water quality standard for all sampling <br /> events since Sampling Event 3. <br /> Other Anal <br /> Analytes that remained below the stream water quality standards throughout the sampling <br /> investigation are arsenic (tr), boron (d), cadmium (d), calcium (d), chromium (d), chromium (tr), <br /> chromium VI and III, copper (d), lead (d), magnesium (d), mercury (tr), nickel (d), selenium (tr), <br /> silver (d), zinc (d), TSS (residue, nonfilterable), fecal coliform and alkalinity. For many of the <br /> analytes listed above, the water quality standard is dependent on the hardness of the water. For <br /> these analytes, the mean hardness (as CaCO3) concentration for that sampling event was used to <br /> calculate the water quality standard. Although a regression analysis is recommended for <br /> calculation of an appropriate hardness value, due to the small number of samples available for <br /> this investigation a regression analysis was not performed. In lieu of a regression analysis, the <br /> mean hardness concentration for each individual sampling event was used to calculate the water <br /> quality criteria. Analytes for which the water quality standards are hardness dependent are: <br /> cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, silver and zinc. <br /> As with the other analytes, hardness as CaCO3 decreased throughout the sampling investigation. <br /> • Hardness values for Sampling Events 1 and 2 ranged from 1280 to 1410 mg/L. By Sampling <br /> Event 3 (May 20, 1997) hardness had decreased significantly and ranged from 484 to 534 mg/L. <br /> Hardness continued to decrease through Sampling Event 7 where it appears to have stabilized. <br /> The mean hardness concentrations for Sampling Events 7, 8, 9 and 10, are 86, 87, 100 and 96 <br /> mg/L, respectively. As hardness decreases, the water quality standards for the above analytes <br /> also decrease. <br /> One sample in Sampling Event 10, indicated a copper (d) concentration that was slightly higher <br /> than the water quality criteria of 0.01 mg/L. A concentration of 0.023 mg/L was indicated in one <br /> sample. This was the only sample out of the 40 samples analyzed which indicated a <br /> concentration higher than the standard for copper. <br /> Fecal Coliform <br /> Fecal coliform was analyzed for in Sampling Events 3, 4 and 5. Fecal coliform was not detected <br /> in any of the samples. <br /> At the request of the Division of Minerals and Geology for the State of Colorado, aluminum was <br /> added to the list of analytes for Sampling Event 7 and will be analyzed throughout the remainder <br /> of the investigation. For the most recent sampling event (July 10, 1997), aluminum (total <br /> recoverable and dissolved), was not detected. <br /> DAPROJECTS\6102-001\SWSUM3.DOC[8-Sep-97] 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.