My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-02-26_PERMIT FILE - M2009018 (24)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2009018
>
2009-02-26_PERMIT FILE - M2009018 (24)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:43:54 PM
Creation date
2/27/2009 1:02:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2009018
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
2/26/2009
Doc Name
Ex. S Geotechnical Stability
From
Varra Companies, Inc.
To
DRMS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Slope Stability Analysis <br />Varra Gravel Operation - Heintzelman Pit <br />Longmont, Colorado <br />Page 2 <br />The author used the software package PC-STABL to evaluate slope stability. Simulations <br />using Spencer, Modified Bishop and Modified Janbu methods were run to determine the <br />most conservative safety factor. The soil characteristics as presented earlier were used in <br />the analysis. Computer generated data sheets are presented in Attachment A. <br />A review of Attachment A shows proposed bank profiles are stable with a calculated safety <br />factor 1.34 during mine side dewatered conditions. Simulations for pit side flood conditions <br />(static water surface) indicate a safety factor of 1.86. <br />Discussion <br />Slope failure analyses for proposed open cut gravel operations at the Varra <br />Heintzelman site indicate proposed slope cuts will be stable for dewatered or static <br />water table conditions. The soil slope angel from the horizontal is much less than the <br />internal friction angel associated with sand and gravel deposits. The high permeability <br />of the bank material reduces the potential for excessive pore pressures within the bank <br />during rapid drawdown events such as dewatering. If any significant modifications to <br />proposed slopes occur this analysis should be considered invalid. <br />Comments <br />The discussions and recommendations in this report represent our professional opinions. <br />Our conclusions, opinions and recommendations are based from information available at <br />this time and we do not guarantee that undiscovered conditions will not become evident in <br />the future. CGRS' report was prepared in accordance with currently accepted engineering <br />practices at this time and location and no other warranties, representations or certifications <br />are implied or intended.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.