My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-02-26_REPORT - C1982057 (14)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2009-02-26_REPORT - C1982057 (14)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:43:54 PM
Creation date
2/27/2009 11:15:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
2/26/2009
Doc Name
2008 Annual Reclamation Report
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Email Name
DTM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
or walking through the area. Frequent stops were made at vantage points to scan and listen for <br />birds in appropriate habitats. <br />Golden Eagle Nest Monitoring <br />Golden eagle nest monitoring was conducted within or near the permit area on April 30, 2008 to <br />check for breeding activity at all known nest sites. Only one golden eagle nesting territory, <br />consisting of five nests (GOEA 9a-9e) in SE SW Section 16 and NE NW Section 21 T5N:R88W, <br />is located on or within 0.5 mile of the Seneca II-West Mine permit area. Biologists drove to the <br />closest vantage point to view the nests through a spotting scope, but conducted observations from <br />a sufficient distance (as per guidelines recommended by Grier and Fyfe 1987) to prevent nest <br />abandonment and/or injury to eggs or young. Nests were observed until their status (active or <br />inactive) could be determined. <br />Sandhill Cranes <br />Biologists watched and listened for sandhill crane activity while traveling through the area and <br />• conducting surveys for other species. All sightings recorded included notes on location, habitat, <br />and behavior. If cranes were observed or heard, biologists targeted potential nesting habitats <br />(i.e., marshes, reservoirs, and moist drainages) to try and determine whether pairs were nesting in <br />the vicinity. Documented nesting sites from the previous years' monitoring were also checked <br />for activity. <br />RESULTS <br />Upland Game Birds <br />The decline of Columbian sharp-tailed grouse in Colorado has been attributed to the loss and <br />degradation of native grassland, sagebrush-grassland, and mountain brush habitats (Hoffman <br />2001). It has been recognized that post-mining reclamation provides suitable habitat for lek sites, <br />nesting, and brood rearing. Mine reclaimed lands account for less than 4% of the occupied range <br />of sharp-tailed grouse in northwestern Colorado, yet supported 16% of the active leks observed <br />in 2007 (Yost 2007). <br />Reclamation at Seneca II-West Mine supports one lek (Seneca II-West 2) and one location where <br />• displaying grouse have been documented in the past. As most grouse observed at leks are males, <br />2008 Seneca II-West Mine Wildlife Monitoring Page 3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.