My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-02-26_REPORT - C1994082 (15)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1994082
>
2009-02-26_REPORT - C1994082 (15)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:43:55 PM
Creation date
2/27/2009 11:13:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
2/26/2009
Doc Name
2008 Annual Reclamation Report
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Email Name
DTM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• from erosion, and help maintain water quality. These features make aspen forests a <br />crucial component of many Western and Northern landscapes. <br />Although in some years aspen does produce abundant crops of viable seed <br />(McDonough 1979), it primarily reproduces from vegetative root suckers throughout <br />most of its range. Occasional seedlings do establish, but seedlings require bare mineral <br />soil and constant moisture to survive (McDonough 1979). These conditions rarely occur <br />in many of the areas where aspen grows today. Aspen typically grows in genetically- <br />identical groups referred to as clones. All stems in a clone sprouted from the roots of <br />parent trees and share a common ancestor. However they do not share a common root <br />system, as connections break down from generation to generation as new trees grow new <br />roots. <br />Most aspen stands are composed of one to several clones that may persist along a <br />continuum of succession stages, from sparsely growing individuals to apparently stable <br />pure or near-pure groves. Although clones are often separate and distinct from one <br />another, studies have demonstrated spatial intermingling where multiple clones are co- <br />located (DeByle 1964; Mitton and Grant 1980; Wyman and others 2003; Hipkins and <br />Kitzmiller 2004). <br />Compared to conifers, aspen ramets - individual stems, or suckers, of the same <br />genotype from a parent root system - are relatively short lived. This is due to succession <br />(replacement of aspen by more shade tolerant species) and/or a typical onslaught of <br />mortality related to stem decays and diseases from ages 80 to 100 years (Baker 1925; <br />Hinds 1985; Potter 1998; Rogers 2002). Aspen thrive where somewhat regular and <br />frequent disturbance promotes regeneration (DeByle and Winokur 1985). Occasionally <br />aspen stands appear to perpetuate themselves with regular low-level regeneration in <br />multi-layer stable stands (Mueggler 1988; Cryer and Murray 1992). Aspen in the western <br />U.S. are longer lived than elsewhere. Healthy aspen trees can live over 300 years <br />(Personal Comm., John Shaw, Forester, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain <br />Research Station) and can attain diameters up to 96.5 cm (38 inches) diameter at breast <br />height (dbh), however most aspen are typically much younger and smaller. Many mature <br />stands in Colorado are currently over 120 years of age (Shepperd 1990). Tree form varies <br />•
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.