My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-02-26_REPORT - C1994082 (15)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1994082
>
2009-02-26_REPORT - C1994082 (15)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:43:55 PM
Creation date
2/27/2009 11:13:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
2/26/2009
Doc Name
2008 Annual Reclamation Report
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Email Name
DTM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• complete count from a distance, the biologist walked out to the lek and flushed the birds for a <br />final count. Searches for new leks on and near the permit area were also conducted from one- <br />half hour before to one hour after sunrise on April 29 and May 2, 2008. In addition to <br />specifically visiting sites where non-displaying grouse were observed in past years, biologists <br />looked and listened for displaying grouse while slowly driving or walking through the area. <br />Frequent stops were made at vantage points to scan and listen for birds in appropriate habitats. <br />Golden Eagle Nest Monitoring <br />Golden eagle nest monitoring was conducted within or near the permit area on April 29 and May <br />2, 2008 to check for breeding activity at all known nest sites. Only one golden eagle nesting <br />territory, consisting of two nests (GOEA 8a and 8b) in SW SE Section 7 T5N:R87W, is located <br />on or within 0.5 mile of the Yoast Mine permit area. Biologists walked to the closest vantage <br />point to view the nests through a spotting scope, but conducted observations from a sufficient <br />distance (as per guidelines recommended by Grier and Fyfe 1987) to prevent nest abandonment <br />and/or injury to eggs or young. Nests were observed until their status (active or inactive) could <br />• be determined. <br />Sandhill Cranes <br />Biologists watched and listened for sandhill crane activity while traveling through the area and <br />conducting surveys for other species. All sightings recorded included notes on location, habitat, <br />and behavior. If cranes were observed or heard, biologists targeted potential nesting habitats <br />(i.e., marshes, reservoirs, and moist drainages) to try and determine whether pairs were nesting in <br />the vicinity. Documented nesting sites from the previous years' monitoring were also checked <br />for activity. <br />RESULTS <br />Upland Game Birds <br />The decline of Columbian sharp-tailed grouse in Colorado has been attributed to the loss and <br />degradation of native grassland, sagebrush-grassland, and shrubland habitats (Hoffman 2001). It <br />. has been recognized that CRP lands provide suitable habitat for lek sites, nesting, and brood <br />rearing. CRP lands account for less than 4% of the occupied range of sharp-tailed grouse in <br />2008 Yoast Mine Wildlife Monitoring Page 3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.