My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-12-09_PERMIT FILE - C1996083 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2008-12-09_PERMIT FILE - C1996083 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:38:45 PM
Creation date
2/24/2009 9:51:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/9/2008
Doc Name
In Dove Gulch Area for New Layout, Maleki Technologies, December 2007
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume IIIA Exhibit 17 Prediction of Surface Deformation Resulting From Longwall Mining
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
indicating uniform subsidence over a portion of a 40-ft-wide barrier separating two room- <br />and-pillar panels (Dunrud 1975). Thus overburden response is characterized by uniform <br />block movement in mines using narrower yield pillars 30 to 40 ft wide based on these <br />measurements. On the contrary, wider pillars used in the Raton basin influenced surface <br />movements and showed minor humps in the subsidence profiles (King 1981). <br />BRL has successfully used yield abutment pillars in the D Seam and LBS and is <br />planning to use similar designs consisting of 47- and 127-ft-wide pillars in the Dove <br />Gulch area. Table 2 presents a summary of subsidence measured from select monuments <br />near the gateroads. With the exception of monument 11 B at shallow cover, most deep- <br />cover monuments subsided approximately 2 to 3.6 ft. The maximum subsidence occurred <br />at monument SB toward the center of this longwall block. Below this monument, at the <br />D4 headgate, BRL used an abutment pillar width of 104 ft. At a comparable position over <br />the D8 headgate (20A), the subsidence was lower and perhaps influenced by 114-ft-wide <br />abutment pillars. Over the gate pillars, the subsidence increased with depth, approaching <br />• 0.4 times the extraction height. <br />Table 2. Maximum measured subsidence over the gate roads for different depths <br />Monument Depth, ft Subsidence, ft Location <br />11A 400 .23 D3 Headgate <br />14E 800 1.7 D6 Headgate <br />18G 1,000 1.9 D7 Headgate <br />12E 1,350 2.9 D4 Headgate <br />56 1,350 3.6 D4 Headgate <br />20A 1,350 3.25 D8 Headgate <br />4.4 Variable topography <br />Surface topography plays an important role, influencing surface movement and <br />fracturing. Studies by the Colorado School of Mines over the Raton basin (King 1981), <br />New Mexico, for instance, indicated high subsidence under topographic highs and low <br />subsidence under topographic lows, i.e., the "pile-up" effect. Surface cracks were also <br />concentrated on the topographic highs. <br />Maleki Technologies, Inc. Page 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.