My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-11-24_PERMIT FILE - C1996083A (15)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1996083A
>
2008-11-24_PERMIT FILE - C1996083A (15)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:38:14 PM
Creation date
2/23/2009 5:29:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/24/2008
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 15 Subsidence Prediction
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
We have assumed an angle of draw of 25 degrees for this study. This <:orresponds <br />to the draw angle widely accepted as a conservative number in the North Fork Valley. <br />1.5 BREAK ANGLES <br />The angle of break is the inclination (from horizontal) of the line connecting the edge <br />of the working with the point of maximum tensile strain, which corresponds to the location <br />of maximum residual cracking and fracturing present at the ground surface. <br />Break angles are less well documented than draw angles. This is probably because <br />surface fracturing is less common than subsidence, since it is generally limited to areas <br />with relatively thin overburden. Also, mining will frequently be designed to prevent the <br />formation of surface fractures. The break angle can never be less than the draw angle. <br />The Subsidence Engineer's Handbook notes that the point of maximum extension <br />corresponds with the position of the ribside where the width/depth ratio is greater than <br />1.35, but lies outside the rib when the ratio is smaller. This indicates a break angle of 90 <br />degrees for relatively wide panels and extraction zones. At width/depth ratios of less than <br />1.35, the distance from the center of the panel to the point of maximum extension <br />increases, indicating a decreasing break angle. <br />Dunrud (1976) notes nearly vertical break lines in several instances, with break <br />angles greater than 90 degrees in other cases. Such high break angles are probably due <br />to tension rather than shear. A break angle of 90 degrees has been assumed for this <br />study. <br />1.6 ZONES OF POTENTIAL FRACTURING <br />Fracturing is likely to occur at the ground surface when mining configurations <br />produce zones of high tensile strain. Tensile strains will generally decrease as the depth <br />of mining increases, so that the risk of surface fracturing will decrease as mining depth <br />increases. <br />During longwall mining and the pillar recovery phase of mining, cracks may form <br />above the retreat line and ultimately above the barrier pillar at the end of the panel as the <br />overlying beds cantilever over the pillar line. This cantilever effect could occur above any <br />- i 0 - 10!00 <br />PR-a y <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.