Laserfiche WebLink
• So in single seam mining the maximum possible subsidence for asuper-critical <br />width panel, S,,,a,~ V(H), is 8.6 feet (0.9 X 9.5), and for double seam mining, S,,,a„ Vo(H) + <br />Va(H),is 8.6 + 9.5 = 18.1 feet(0.9 X 9.5 + 1.0 X 9.5) <br />They go further to estimate the maximum subsidence for a panel at sub-critical <br />width, s,,,a,,, with the expression; <br />s,,,a„ = S/m(Sme,~ Where; S/m is obtained from Figure 15-2 <br />Figure 15-2 produces a subsidence reduction factor for the fact that the panel is <br />sub-critical of 0.52 fora 1,500 feet deep single seam mining panel, so s,,,a„ is 4.5 feet. <br />Under the current mine plan the maximum amount of subsidence anticipated will be <br />experienced in the center of longwall panels D-2 and B-1 in double seam mining where the <br />overburden depth reaches approximately 800 feet to the B-seam and 500 feet to the D- <br />seam. Figure 15-2 produces panel correction factors of 0.85 at the B-seam depth and 0.73 <br />at the D-seam depth, so s,,,~ is 7.3 + 6.9 = 14.2 feet. <br />Where full extraction zones overly or underly partial extraction zones, i.e. gateways, <br />• the maximum subsidence is less and the subsidence profile is affected. <br />Gentry and Abel (1978) report values of subsidence reduction factor ranging <br />between 0.51 and 0.71, with the higher values corresponding to subsidence on the ridge <br />line. Their data were measured at the York Canyon Mine, a longwall operation, in New <br />Mexico, where the Raton Formation, which overlies the mined seam is of a somewhat <br />similar character to the Mesaverde Formation in the North Fork of the Gunnison River <br />Valley. <br />Maximum Subsidence Over Mined Areas <br />The maximum subsidence over mined areas (S) would equal the maximum possible <br />subsidence (Smax = 8.6 feet in single seam mining or 18.1 feet in double seam mining) if <br />the total width of the extracted zone exceeded the critical width, the width of the extracted <br />zone exceeded 1.4 times the overburden height. Such a case may not arise at the <br />proposed mine. <br /> <br />PR-08 - 6 - 07/03 <br />APPRaveO <br />9'~2 5 /0 3 <br />