My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-11-24_PERMIT FILE - C1996083 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2008-11-24_PERMIT FILE - C1996083 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:38:13 PM
Creation date
2/23/2009 4:57:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/24/2008
Doc Name
3rd Quarter 2007 North Fork Valley Seimic Network Monitoring Report
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume IIIA Exhibit 18 Seismic Monitoring at BR Longwall Coal Mine
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />North Fork Valley Seismic Network -Third Quarter 2007T <br />Magnitude uncertainties are typically 0.1 to 0.2 magnitude units based on comparisons with <br />magnitudes of larger events as estimated by the USGS National Earthquake Information Center <br />(NEIC) in Golden, Colorado (D. Wolny, personal communication, 2007). Coda duration <br />magnitudes (M~) are also automatically calculated by Earthworm based on a USGS northern <br />California formula. MC values are approximately the same as ML. <br />RESULTS <br />Seismic Event Locations <br />Table 3 lists the events recorded and relocated in the third quarter (ML >_ 1.5). The date and <br />origin time (hours, minute, and second) of the event, location (latitude, longitude, and general <br />area), magnitudes, and largest PGA values are listed. <br />Figure 2 shows the resulting locations for the 187 seismic events of approximate ML 1.5 and <br />larger. The seismic events cluster in four distinct areas indicating where the mining activity <br />occurred during this quarter. No mining-related seismic events were located in the vicinity of <br />Bruce Park Dam or the landslide area (Figure 2). The largest events to occur during the <br />reporting period were two ML 2.6 events both of which occurred at the West Elk Mine on 9 and <br />15 August (shown in red on Figure 2). The largest earthquake to occur at Bowie No. 2 Mine was <br />an ML 2.1 event that occurred on 21 July. Approximately 54 events can be associated with the <br />Bowie mining operations. The activity at Bowie No. 2 Mine corresponds reasonably well with <br />the location of mining activity during the quarter (Figure 2). There are two clusters of events at <br />the Bowie No. 2 Mine. One of these clusters is located about 1.5 km (0.9 mi) northwest of Bowie <br />No. 2 and the other is about 2.5 km (1.6 mi) north-northeast of the mine area (Figure 2). <br />Seismic Event Magnitudes <br />Of the 187 events relocated, 184 were assigned magnitudes (Table 3). ML values were assigned <br />to 117 events by-Dave Wolny (written communication, 2007) as determined from the MSSN. <br />M~ values assigned by Earthworm are also listed in Table 3. <br />Recorded Peak Ground Accelerations <br />PGA values (in g's: 1 g = 980 cm/sec2) were also recorded for all triggered events on the three- <br />component accelerometers. We have included the largest PGA recorded for each relocated <br />seismic event in Table 3 when available, the station that recorded the ground motion and the <br />event-to-station distance. The largest PGA recorded during the quarterly period was 0.09 g at <br />station FGH for a ML 1.9 event at a distance of 0.7 km (0.4 mi). This event occurred on 15 <br />September 2007 at the Bowie No. 2 Mine. <br />To determine potential ground motions at the nearby Bruce Park Dam and landslide area and <br />within the mine areas, we have plotted the recorded PGA values as a function of epicentral <br />distance for earthquakes during the third quarter of 2007 (Figure 3). We used epicentral <br />distances for plotting the ground motions because the mining-related events are very shallow and <br />so epicentral and hypocentral distances are similar. (Epicentral distance is the distance to the <br />~~ W:U(_WCFS\PROJECTS\NORTHFORK-BOWIE\QUARTERLYREPORTS\200703\03_2007_BRL_FINAL.DOCN2-FEB-08\\OAK 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.