Laserfiche WebLink
in the TR-62 application. This issue has been resolved, but the Division has comments <br />on retention of the shop, well, and road in the New Items section below. <br />2. The Division asked SCC to submit an amended Exhibit 7-1A to include the location of the W-25 <br />series monitoring wells. SCC submitted the revised map; this issue is resolved. <br />3. The Division asked SCC to: <br />Confirm whether or not S-49 and "Friederich Spring #1" are the same feature - <br />SCC confirmed that S-49 and Friederich Spring #1 are one in the same; issue resolved. <br />Revise the apparently inaccurate statement on page 16-11 regarding the location of the <br />Friederich #1 and #2 springs - <br />SCC revised page 16-11 to accurately reflect the current information on the two springs; issue <br />resolved. <br />Confirm or amend the site location/drainage source for Friederich Spring #2 on Table 16- <br />1A and Exhibit 16-1 - <br />SCC revised Table 16-1A and Exhibit 16-1 to describe and depict the location/drainage source <br />for both springs; issue resolved. <br />Address how compliance with provision of Rule 4.05.15, Water Rights and Replacement, <br />has been (or will be) achieved with respect to the adjudicated spring (or springs) <br />impacted by mining on the Friederich property in the South Mine area. <br />SCC proposes to replace the flow from the two springs with water flowing into Pond 016. This is <br />acceptable for the remainder of the time the mine is permitted, but since it is not clear whether <br />SCC has rights to store water in Pond 016 on a permanent basis, and Pond 016 has not been <br />approved for permanent retention (SCC has not provided any of the required information for <br />retention of this pond), the proposed plan does not address water replacement on a permanent <br />basis. Prior to final bond release, SCC will need to obtain approval for permanent retention of <br />Pond 016 or propose an alternate replacement/augmentation plan for the water rights to the <br />springs. Please indicate whether SCC intends to address this concern along with the review of <br />TR-62, or would prefer that resolution of this item be addressed in a stipulation to our approval <br />of the revision. <br />Please update Attachment 16-A, "Water Rights Investigation and Plan for Augmentation" to <br />include a discussion of the Friederich springs. <br />4. The Division requested that SCC provide an additional Rill and Gully Survey addendum to <br />include the final geotechnical report and remedial plan for each of the Shrub Plot Slide and <br />Pond 016 Slide. SCC committed to submitting the required information. This response is <br />accepted. Please to commit to submitting the addendum within 60 days of the final report. <br />5. The Division noted that updates to the revegetation plan were warranted. The original <br />adequacy concerns from the Division were: <br />a. The woody plant density standard for aspen planting areas needs to be defined and <br />-2-