My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-01-30_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1994082
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1994082
>
2009-01-30_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1994082
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:43:16 PM
Creation date
2/13/2009 3:15:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
1/30/2009
Doc Name
Nomination for 2009 Excellence in Surface Coal Mining National Reclamation Award
From
Seneca Coal Company
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />Preliminary Pilot Study <br />A pilot study has been conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of supplemental irrigation on <br />growth and survival of transplanted aspen sapling trees, where the experimental conditions allowed <br />observation on several additional variables. In addition to irrigation (four levels of watering), we were <br />able to observe growth and survival of aspen of different plant type (transplants, natural sprouts, or potted <br />plants), soil type (roto-cleared/fresh or dozer-cleared/stored soil), and different levels of plant competition <br />(hand removal of competing vegetation or no removal). Results of the preliminary study were: <br />Irrigation. Best growth and survival was with low or no irrigation, but salinity of irrigation water in the <br />first two years of the experiment reduced growth of trees receiving high and medium amounts of <br />irrigation. Care must be taken to provide low saline water when irrigating planted aspen trees on <br />reclaimed lands. Low level irrigation and no irrigation growth and survival were similar, suggesting that <br />enough rainfall occurred during the initial years of this experiment so that soil moisture was adequate <br />without irrigation. <br />Plant source. Transplanted trees from local sources grew best once established. Most natural suckers did <br />not survive without removal of competing vegetation. Potted plants had a high rate of survival and <br />seemed to grow well the first year, but growth was lower than for transplants and natural sprouts after <br />three years. Roots of the potted aspen generally stayed in the augured potting hole. <br />Soil !ype. Best growth and survival occurred on roto-cleared/fresh soil compared to dozer cleared/stored <br />soil. More natural sprouts from residual root segments were evident in roto-cleared soil, likely due to the <br />shorter length of soil storage and the soil characteristics rather than the clearing method. The dozer <br />cleared soil appeared to be more compacted and was less well drained than the roto-cleared soil, and it is <br />expected that these physical characteristics and storage effects on the soil were more important to tree <br />growth than the method of clearing. <br />Control of plant competition. The best growth of aspen was with trees that were hand hoed to remove all <br />competing vegetation. This was likely related to lower water stress of the trees, since all adjacent <br />vegetation competed with the trees for the limited water supply. This was particularly apparent on the <br />roto-cleared soils where there was a high biomass of competing vegetation. <br />Root growth. Similar to top growth, root growth on the roto-cleared soil was greater in plots where <br />competing vegetation was removed by hoeing compared to plots where competing vegetation was left <br />intact. Effect of competing vegetation removal on root growth of dozer cleared soils was less evident, <br />likely since amount of competing vegetation was considerably less and growth was less on the dozer <br />cleared soils. Lateral roots in most treatments were of sufficient size support suckering, but sucker <br />initiation was likely inhibited by apical dominance of the growing trees. Lateral root extension was
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.