My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-01-29_REVISION - C1981019 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2009-01-29_REVISION - C1981019 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:43:14 PM
Creation date
1/30/2009 3:19:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
1/29/2009
Doc Name
3rd Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
Colowyo Coal Company
Type & Sequence
TR72
Email Name
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Colowyo Mine <br />TR-72 PARS <br />29 January 2009 <br />Page 3 of 8 <br />would fit in the permit text under the topsoil heading (Pages 2.05-46 to 49). This <br />documentation will be important if topsoil depth is varied within a single <br />reclamation unit, as described on Page 2.05-48. Additionally, Colowyo will need to <br />include a new topsoil balance chart that details the replacement depths within each <br />unit. This commitment and map/text in the ARR will help document that Colowyo <br />has met the topsoil replacement requirements necessary to achieve Phase II Bond <br />Release. <br />Finally, the Division is requesting that Colowyo dig representative test holes in the <br />newly spread topsoil to ensure that the proper depth or range of replacement depths <br />is being met. This is critical given the innovative approach in topsoil replacement <br />that Colowyo is proposing. The test holes should be spaced appropriately to get an <br />adequate sample size but should be spaced no farther apart than one hole every 500 <br />feet. <br />4. Item Resolved in first adequacy review. <br />Revegetation [(2.05.4(2)(e) and 4.151 <br />Supplemental Introduction in amended Section 2.05.4 <br />5. In the 26 June 2008 letter, the Division requested that Colowyo amend the woody plant <br />density standards section of the narrative to conform with specified criteria pertaining to <br />minimum shrub steppe acreage, shrub density within "core" and "ecotone" areas, and <br />certain species limitations, and further requested that provisions allowing for "positive <br />recruitment" based standard reductions be eliminated. <br />In their 28 July 2008 responses, Colowyo proposed modified criteria that did not fully <br />comply with the Division's request. <br />The Division believes that the criteria laid out in our 26 June 2008 letter are appropriate, <br />with only minor adjustment, based on discussion with DOW staff on 20 January 2009, <br />consideration of currently approved woody plant density standards at other surface mines <br />in northwest Colorado, and shrub establishment success that is reasonable to expect using <br />appropriate native seed mixes, soil handling, cultural, and management practices. The <br />Division believes further reduction with respect to shrub steppe acreage or the numeric <br />density standard for the post-2008 areas would not be appropriate, given the original <br />understanding that wildlife habitat with a significant shrub component would be the <br />major focus of reclamation efforts on these lands. The Division will agree to the request <br />that fourwing saltbush shrubs be allowed to count toward the density standard, to the <br />extent that no more than 20% of countable shrubs be fourwing saltbush. As such, the <br />woody plant density success criteria will need to be stated as follows:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.