Laserfiche WebLink
2.0 SAMPLING METHODS <br />2.1 Community Type Mapping <br />Preliminary community mapping of the study area (prior to sampling) was completed using 2002 <br />true-color aerial imagery with approximately 1.5-meter resolution, Communities were generally <br />delineated based on photographic signatures to a polygon size of approximately one acre using ArcGIS <br />software, and without benefit of ground reconnaissance. Ground-truthing, correction, and refining of <br />these preliminary delineations was completed during the summer vegetation surveys and all corrections <br />were noted on field maps. <br />Following ground-truthing activities, the vegetation study area, as well as a two-mile wildlife study <br />boundary external to the vegetation study area, was re-delineated to a polygon size of approximately <br />0.25 acre, taking into account field corrections. The precision of this post-sampling delineation was <br />substantially aided given the acquisition of 0.5-meter resolution color-infrared remote sensing imagery <br />exposed in September of 2005 (see Map V1). Mapping and ground-truthing identified six major <br />40 communities (Aspen, Bottomland, Grassland, Juniper Scrub, Mountain Shrub and Sagebrush) and <br />numerous minor communities (e.g. cultivated fields, wetlands, etc.), as well as several sub-types (e.g. <br />mesic, xeric) of various communities. <br />2.2 Sample Layout <br />The sample layout protocol for 2005 baseline vegetation evaluations is a procedure designed to <br />better account for the heterogeneous expression of vegetation communities within the study area while <br />precluding bias in the sample site selection process. By design, the procedure is initiated randomly, and <br />thereafter, samples are located in a systematic manner, along grid coordinates spaced at fixed distances, <br />e.g. 100 ft. (see the lower left corner of Figure V-1 and Map V1). In this manner, "representation" from <br />across each community type is "forced" rather than risking the chance that significant pockets are <br />entirely missed, or overemphasized as often occurs with simple random sampling. <br />The procedure for sample location within the vegetation study area occurred as follows. First, a <br />systematic grid that could be "nested" (e.g. 100 ft. x 100 ft.) was selected. By nesting, it is meant that <br />grid dimensions could be readily changed to 100 x 100, 200 x 200, 300 x 300 or so on so that it was <br />possible to provide approximately 50 coordinate intersections that could be used for sample sites within <br />each community type (or 15 to 30 for reference areas). For example, one type that only occupied minor <br />CIEEDAR CREEK A5530A'II9Effi, INC. Page 5 2005 Collom Vegetation Survey