My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-12-17_REVISION - C1981019 (142)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2010-12-17_REVISION - C1981019 (142)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:28:03 PM
Creation date
1/29/2009 3:18:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
12/17/2010
Doc Name
Exhibit 9 Item 8 Baseline Survey of Soil Resources Collom Mining Area
Type & Sequence
PR3
Email Name
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Baseline Survey of Soil Resources - Collom Mining Area July, 2006 <br /> <br />Additional parameters were analyzed in accordance with the following protocol: <br />Fertility _(Organic Matter Content, Nitrogen Phosphorus and Potassium : <br />The following horizons from all sample sites were analyzed for soil fertility: <br />? All A horizons; <br />? All B and C horizons beginning within 24 inches of the ground surface; and, <br />? Those B and C horizons with less than 35% clay and less than 35% coarse fragments. <br />Boron and Selenium: <br />Boron and selenium were not known to be present in elevated concentrations in the Survey Area. However, <br />to provide information for screening, the thickest horizon beginning within the top 24 inches of the soil profile <br />was analyzed for these parameters. <br />Soil Map Unit Development <br />Preliminary map unit boundaries were identified in the field where supported by available data and site <br />inspection. Boundaries of preliminary map units were further refined based on the results of pedon <br />descriptions and development of conceptual map units. Many of the conceptual map units were <br />documented in the field for further refinement based on review of all available information, including <br />laboratory results and final pedon classifications. <br />Following completion of the field effort, two significant resources became available to further assist in map <br />unit refinement. The first of these resources was a new high-resolution, color satellite image with a false- <br />color infrared display. This image revealed more detail related to vegetation communities, outcrop <br />patterns, and early fall soil moisture levels. The second resource was development of hillshade models to <br />simulate the accumulation of loess deposits in the Survey Area. This simple tool visually simulates those <br />j areas most likely to accumulate loess with various prevailing winds. In combination with one another, <br />these resources dramatically improved the accuracy and precision of the survey. <br />Each map unit within the Survey Area was described by documenting soil series and families found in the <br />map unit, their relative composition, and their placement relative to one another. Map units produced as <br />part of this survey were composed primarily of consociations and complexes, with the smallest units <br />approximately 0.5 acres in size. <br />RESULTS <br />Pedon Descriptions <br />Pedon description forms for each of the 456 sites observed in the Survey Area are presented in Appendix <br />A. These forms were updated with the results of laboratory analysis, where available, and classified first to <br />the family level and then correlated to series identified as major components of NRCS map units within <br />five miles of the Survey Area. The pedon classifications yielded 53 unique textural families, including thirty <br />series and 23 families with no corresponding series identified in nearby portions of the NRCS surveys. <br />The series identified, along with variants and taxadjuncts, represented 393 of the 456 pedons (86 percent) <br />described in the Order II Survey Area. <br />Identifying the correct soil temperature and moisture regime is critical to determining the correct <br />classification in accordance with the current Keys to Soil Taxonomy (USDA, 2006). In-depth review of the <br />NRCS survey of Moffat County (USDA 2005a) revealed significant changes in the soil temperature and <br />moisture regimes within the Survey Area. Onsite evaluation of soil and vegetation and discussions with <br />Charles Peacock, soil scientist in the Craig, Colorado, NRCS soil survey office (Charles Peacock personal <br />communication with Judd Stark), confirmed that the major regime changes do exist and provided insight <br />into the likely patterns. <br />i <br />Tetra Tech, Inc. 3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.