2008-12-04_PERMIT FILE - C1981033

Home Browse Search

l,... 411. ~ , .. .. .^. :..:': .:.; ac~.';: .. AA, a..}y'Y. J:.'1:~~~7::6' ~Tv Nfi. .~~e.j,iy)',i+`{G) . r. _ . ~ ..~ .~ .... .' i •. .. .M1 .1 - . 1. F.•..r..Y .. ;.A.' .. ..' ~• :: ~. ~ ... ... .r.: ... •..... ''.. .. .. .. - ,bn Prmtt representing the Bear Coal Mina~~met riithA.the Commission regarding moving the site of Bear Conl Mine operations !o the foner Yindjauer Coal Kine owned 6y Anchor Coal Co. At the some time, the Couission revieved ad- ditional information regarding a miror impact land use charge to split otrect in Somerset (severing the Portal business ~_ from a portion of land referred to as Lot 1 and which contains Bradley's hwe). Though such sabdivisian mould create lot sizes more similar to those which currently'exist in Somerset. Dick Yingerson talked with Bradley via telephone regarding the Bradley proposal and its tie to the Beor pro- powl. Bradley cants to be free and clear of Lot 1, pith the potential of being able to retain the business aper ation. A review of setback provisions for couerciol development as defined in the land Use Resolution shooed Uwt setbacks for couerciol use may be reduced to zero for adjacent placement of businesses. Yingerson gill draft recommendations for both the Bradley and Bear Mine proposals and put them before the Com- mission later in the meeting. tiStiY MARK DAILT and BILL EARLY, representing the City of Gunnison, met pith the Commission to discuss similar goals of catnty and city, esyecially in regard to a potential Urban Service Area around the City. Daily deaonsirated varioas residential densities now existing within the city, and shoed proposed sever treatment trunk lines to serve an ursan service area; to Dos Rios, to Tall Texan north df Gunnison, and east to the boundary 6etrreen the cemetery and private ground east of faun. A likely eater source will be from a point south of Almon( at the D'fallon Ditch headgote. Ne introduced 'Foiicies far thought' relative to these matters: I. Growth will pay its own voy to the maxi:um extent possible. :. Growth densities rill occur in a generally predictable manner. 3. Policies will control, n.) Location of types of development, and b.) Location and timing of development and 'timing of service extensions. Yiryerson r~dted that it is necessary to specify particular densities as yell as arterial roaas, ana min arter- ies for suer ana eater development. tttt:: UI~ YiNL•E.RS9N moved and Marry Esmiol seconded a motion to forward to the Board of County Commissioners the fal- lo~t:r, Finaings and Recommendations concerning Land Use Change #b# of the 1981 series, the application of Do;io ana is- tger ~. 9raaley for a chnr~ge in lot tines between Lots 1 and 2 in the Toun of Somerset to separate the Portal bar ana Laccge from an aa~oining residence. The purpose of le change in la: tines is to facilitate financing of t::e sate of. the property dots 1 ana :) :o Becr Coal Coapany. ?he proposed lot lane change will creole a zero setback of the too buildings from the new lot line. This vould v:aicte aunty design cr:leria for residential development, but vould be acceylable in business or ccaaer:cal develcp- Rer:.. There are no other conflicts with county policies, guidelines, or general design criteria. The ?longing Comaission recoaaends that LUC #1481-64 be given a Migor iopact ciassificatian and approved with the condit:cn that upon filing the lot line charge, the use o{ Lot :will be changed from residential to business and coamernal. ~t&~ -~~ ~. ii!E !!D?IDN PASSED annrimously, '-' L'IC~ YINGE35GN moved and °orry Esmiol seconded a motion to fonrard to the Board the fallowing Findings and 4ec- oaaerr'ations concerning :and Use Change #b5 of the 1981 series; the oppiication of the Bear Cool coapany to open a new portal southwest of the Taun of Somerset. Page d