Laserfiche WebLink
Response to Comments <br />• <br />• <br />C <br />Table 5-1 <br />DEIS Comments and Responses <br />Commenter Comment Comment/Response <br /> <br /> their plamling and decision-making processes and to evaluate and report those <br /> efforts, as appropriate, in documents prepared pursuant to NEPA. Moreover, <br /> EPA's Coal bed Methane Outreach Program, which began in 1994, is a <br /> voluntary program through which the U. S. coal industry has captured and <br /> used 308 billion cubic feet (Bcf) of coal mine methane. The 10 active mines <br /> in the U.S. with methane capture projects operating in 2002 used 44 billion <br /> cubic feet of methane, which offset almost 18 million metric tons of carbon <br /> dioxide emissions. In turn, this provided enough energy to heat 638,000 <br /> homes. To date such efforts are being accomplished in underground coal <br /> mines in Alabama, Virginia, West Virginia and Pennsylvania. Indeed, the <br /> portion of the West Elk Mine's methane released from the drainage wells <br /> would be sufficient to heat several thousand homes, and has a value of <br /> approximately $15 to $25 million dollars annually. <br /> Given the project's release of significant quantities of methane, there is an <br /> important economic and environmental opportunity here to capture and utilize <br /> the methane resource. <br /> RESPONSE: MCC is a member of EPA's CMOP program; however, since <br /> the Federal gas reserve (methane) is not under lease, it is illegal for it to be <br /> used for these beneficial purposes until leased (see FEIS, Chapter 2, <br /> Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Study). <br />US EPA 4 Given the potentially significant amount of methane that will be released from <br /> the project, we recoirunend that the final EIS analyze measures for capturing <br /> all or a part of the methane to be vented from the mine. While EPA <br /> understands that there is no lease in place that would allow the methane <br /> encountered as a by-product of the mining to be captured and put to beneficial <br /> (i.e., profitable) use, the lack of a lease should not preclude evaluation of <br /> measures to capture and reuse this resource. CEQ's regulations direct an <br /> agency to analyze reasonable alternatives not within the jurisdiction of the <br /> lead agency. Methane capture and reuse is a reasonable alternative to the <br /> proposal of venting the methane to the atmosphere, and thus, we recommend <br /> that it be analyzed. <br /> REPPONSE: See EPA response #3. Leasing of the gas resource and its <br /> reduction in the methane is not being analyzed at this time. EPA's suggestion <br /> has been considered in Chapter 2, Alternatives Considered but Eliminated <br /> from Detailed Study. <br />Deer Creek Ventilation Shaft and E Seam Methane Drainage Wells FEIS <br />195 <br />