Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 5 <br />Table 5-1 <br />DEIS Comments and Responses <br />Commenter Comment Comment/Response <br /> <br /> pollutant subject to regulation under the Federal Act, that is located on one or <br /> more contiguous or adjacent properties and that is owned or operated by the <br /> same person or by persons under common control. <br /> The proposed 168 coal gas drainage wells which will spew pollution fora 12 <br /> year period clearly constitute a "building, structure, facility, or installation, or <br /> any combination thereof," clearly belong to the same industrial grouping, <br /> clearly will emit air pollutants regulated under the Clean Air Act, and are <br /> clearly located on one or more contiguous or adjacent properties that are <br /> owned and operated by the same persons or persons under common control. <br /> The failure to analyze and assess the type and amount of regulated air <br /> pollutants that will be released from the drainage wells clearly indicates the <br /> USFS has failed to ensure compliance with the Clean Air Act and the <br /> Colorado SIP. <br /> Finally, the failure to analyze and assess the coal gas emissions from the <br /> proposed drainage simply violates NEPA's "hard look" requirement. As <br /> explained, the USFS has failed to adequately analyze and assess the air <br /> quality impacts of the proposed coal gas drainage, thereby failing to ensure <br /> compliance with applicable clean air laws and regulations. The DEIS is <br /> therefore insufficient under NEPA. <br /> RESPONSE: It is estimated that only 6 to 8 methane drainage wells will be <br /> operating at any given time during the span of the project using mobile <br /> exhausters for a duration, at any given well, estimated at less than 3 years. <br /> This, according to Colorado permitting standards, is therefore not a stationary <br /> source (as it is mobile) subject to the stationary source list which applies to <br /> certain categories of facilities none of which include "coal mines". In fact, <br /> methane drainage has been occurring for approximately 6 years at the West <br /> Elk Mine in quantities nearly double the estimated value for this coal wain <br /> under the same Colorado air permit where the regulated emissions apply only <br /> to fugitive dust under Regulation 1 (5 CCR 1001-3). Additional information <br /> on MCC's permitting is provided in the FEIS (Chapter 3 Air Quality Section). <br /> USGS reference used by Rocky Mountain Clean Air Action applies to "coal <br /> bed gas" also known as coalbed methane which involves directly drilling into <br /> unworked coal and coal measures strata to release the methane adsorbed to <br /> the coal. The methane referred to in this document is "coal mine methane" <br /> which gas is released due to the relaxation of pressure and fracturing of the <br /> strata during coal mining activity. However, additional identified compounds <br /> (VOCs) were added to air quality analysis (Chapter 3, Air Quality) which <br /> already included a discussion of VOCs from MDW vents and from vehicular <br /> emissions. <br /> There was no claim in the DEIS that "NAAQS" for "ozone" would be <br /> "protected". The EIS states ozone is a "criteria pollutant" and that "ambient <br /> air quality standards must not be exceeded in areas where the general public <br /> has access" and "would not exceed any established air quality standards" <br /> (DEIS/FEIS, Chapter 3, Air Quality Section). <br />Rocky Mountain 4 West Elk Mine Permit Concerns <br /> <br /> <br />i <br />186 Deer Creek Ventilation Shaft and E Seam Methane Drainage Wells FEIS <br />