Laserfiche WebLink
Alternatives Considered in Detail <br /> further refined to eliminate 1 mile of road <br />• associated with the Dry 1=ork Lease (COC- <br />f <br />l <br />' <br />-h <br /> e rationa <br />e <br />ar <br />%,?~ ~2) in the \\ <br />est I~Ik 1RA. 1 <br /> this chan~~e was to ensure consistency ~~'ith the <br /> Roadless Area Conservation Rule of ~UU 1. <br /> Methane draina~~e ~~~ell locations are still <br /> analyzed in the West Llk IR,A Proposed Action <br /> Alternative. Some of the proposed locations <br /> were moved adjacent to existing life of mine <br />~ <br /> in 1 R.A. Other <br />roads to avoid road construction <br /> locations are still analyzed as the Deed exists to <br /> continue mining operations in those areas and <br /> Othel' teCllIlology may become available ~+~hich <br /> allows construction of locations and drillin~~ of <br /> wells without the construction of roads to <br /> access them. <br /> Additional 1'eCOmmeildat1o11S were made by <br /> Colorado Division of Vvildlife in a project <br /> meeting with regard ropost-project road use. <br /> resulting in reclamation by obliteration of an <br /> existing full-sized road ~~ hich vas duplicative <br /> in purpose to another existing full size road <br /> (Poison Gulch, 7l l .•'C). The Paonia Ranger <br />• District, also in the process of a Travel <br /> Management Plan EIS, proposed to close the <br /> Poison Gulch Road to full-size traffic and <br /> Illalntalll It on the 5ysteril aS all Al V trail ~~•hich <br /> would al]ow more public access than it <br /> cun•ently gets as a system road behind a locked <br /> gate for much of the year. <br /> Specific activities involved in the Proposed <br /> Action are given below: <br /> Deer Creek tihaf't includes: <br />ConsU-ucting a ventilation shalt to create <br />an airshaft 2U to ?8 foot diameter by -~00 <br />feet deep (Figure 4). <br />Constructing an emergency escapewa_y 6 <br />to 6.~ feet in diameter by -l•UO feet deep. <br />Consu-ucting an enclosure (20 foot by 30 <br />foot steel-sided shed) for the emergency <br />escapeway and electrical ~~enerati~m <br />e(luipment for emergency escape hoist. <br />Performing Operations and Maintenance. <br />Perforn~ing interim reclamation OIl pad <br />and light-use (low-volume) road once <br />shaft and emer~~ency structures are <br />constructed; and <br />JS r <br />yr ~ ~ ., .. <br />it -~ r r ~ ~ ~ G , <br />~ ~ <br />The Proposed Action includes analysis of the <br />]Host surface disturbing method ilf shaft <br />construction (conventional methods). However. <br />construction activities, as planned. may be <br />significantly less disturbing to to the use of <br />differing technology. <br />~Ilaft and escapeway «~ould use a Disturbed area for the shaft is estimated to be ~ <br />• ~~r~viously approved and constructed pad acres. Sub-soil stockpile is anticipated to be <br />gild access road southeast of Milu~esota piled directly east of shafts. The only tacilities <br />'reek Reservoir (Figure 3). visible im the surface associated with the <br />Deer Greek Ventilation Shaft and E seam Methane Draina~*e V1'e11s f=L•1S t ~ <br />• Sealing airshatt and esrlpeway with <br />concrete steel structure 10 feet bclo~~' <br />ground surtace and perf0l'llllilg tinal <br />surface reclamations when no longer <br />needed at end of life of mine (mine life <br />estimated at 13-1> years). <br />