Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 1 <br />4) Coal Methane Drainage Project NEPA <br />analyses and related decisions: Decision <br />Memos from 2001; Panel 15 Methane <br />Drainage Wells EA and DN/FONSI, <br />2001; Panels 16 to 24 EA and <br />DN/FONSI, 2002; Sylvester Road. Tem- <br />porary Road Construction. and Box Can- <br />yon Methane Drainage Wells EA and <br />DN/FONSI, 2003. <br />5) West Flatiron Federal Coal Lease EA and <br />DN/FONSI, 2003. <br />6) North Fork Coal EIS and Record of Deci- <br />sion, 2000. <br />7) Mountain Coal Company Geotechnical <br />Boreholes Decision Memo, 2006 <br />8) E-seam Development Methane Drainage <br />Wells, Decision Meino, July 2005 <br />9) Box Canyon Methane Drainage Wells <br />Decision Memo, 2005 <br />10) Dry Fork Coal Lease-by-Application Fi- <br />nal EIS, 2005 and Record of Decision, <br />2006. <br />11) Sylvester Gulch/Long Draw Supplemen- <br />tal EA and DN/FONSI, 2006. <br />12) Mountain Coal Company, Mining and <br />Reclamation Plan for the West Elk Mine <br />(MCC 2007a), including various consult- <br />ants' reports on subsidence, vegetation, <br />riparian resources, ground water, and <br />Annual Hydrologic Reports on water <br />monitoring (MCC 2007b). <br />13) USGS and Colorado Geological Survey <br />reports on the local area. <br />Document Structure <br />Chapter 1. Pua pose of and Need for Action: <br />The chapter includes information on the history <br />of the project proposal, the purpose of and need <br />for the project, and the agency's proposal for <br />achieving that purpose and need. Authorizing <br />actions are summarized and the decision <br />framework is described. This section details <br />how the Forest Service informed the public of <br />the proposal. and the public `s response. <br />• <br />The Forest Service has prepared this <br />Envirommental Impact Statement in compliance <br />with the National Environmental Policy Act <br />(NEPA) and other relevant Federal and State <br />laws and regulations. This Environmental <br />Impact Statement discloses the direct, indirect, <br />and cumulative environmental impacts that <br />would result from the proposed action and <br />alternatives. The document is organized into <br />four chapters: <br />Chapter 2. Alternatives, including the P~°oposed <br />Action: This chapter provides a more detailed <br />description of the a.gency's proposed action as <br />well as alternative methods for achieving the <br />stated purpose. This discussion also includes <br />mitigation measures. Finally, this section <br />provides a table summarizing the <br />environmental consequences associated with <br />each alternative. <br />Chapter 3. Affected Environment and <br />Environmental Consequences: This chapter <br />describes the environmental effects of <br />implementing the proposed action and other <br />alternatives. This analysis is organized by <br />resource. <br />Chapter 4. Consultation and Coordination: <br />This chapter provides a list of preparers and <br />agencies consulted during the development of <br />the environmental impact statement. <br />References: Full references used in the analysis <br />and cited in the EIS are presented here. <br />Acronyms: Because this is a government <br />document, this EIS uses many acronyms. They <br />are all spelled out in this section, starting on <br />page 207. <br />Index: The index provides page numbers by <br />document topic. <br />Appendices: The appendices provide more <br />detailed information to support the analyses <br />presented in the envirommental impact <br />statement. <br />• <br />Additional documentation, including more <br />detailed analyses of project-area resources, may <br />be found in the project planning record located <br />at the Forest Supervisor's Office. <br />12 Deer Creek Ventilation Shaft and E Seam Methane Drainage Wells FEIS <br />