Laserfiche WebLink
• The net conclusion is that potential effects of runoff from the mine site <br />area are not likely to have a significant effect on water quality of Hubbard Creek or <br />the North Fork. <br />Hydrologic studies of the mine site area and the area above indicate that <br />no interruption of the quantity of water flowing to Hubbard Creek will result because <br />of the mining activity. A small ephemeral drainage crosses the northwest corner of <br />the lease area and is the only drainage channel that crosses the affected area, <br />except Hubbard Creek. Large scale aerial photographs flown in 1975, 1976 and 1977 <br />clearly show this. <br />Mine aubaidence is not expected to have any significant affect on surface <br />or groundwater. There are no permanent streams over the areas that have been or will <br />be mined. A single ephemeral stream channel crosses the western and northern <br />portions of the area. An examination of a portion of this channel on December 9, <br />1981, showed no evidence of recent flow. Soil deposits and leaf debris, similar to <br />those on adjacent slopes, were found in the channel, along with a lack of any recent <br />• coarser-grained stream-laid deposits, scour, or any other indications of water flow. <br />Vegetation is well developed and mature in portions of the channel, further <br />indicating that flow is rare and probably quite short-lived when it does occur. <br />Subsidence could affect flow in this channel but the rarity of flow events makes it <br />clear that any reduction due to subsidence would have virtually no affect on the <br />average flow rate of Hubbard Creek. <br />The apparent rarity of flow in the ephemeral drainage discussed above, <br />together with the fact there are no known springs above the coal seam, indicate that <br />neither sheet wash nor subsurface flov from the area above the coal seam contribute <br />significantly to the flow of Hubbard Creek. This is further indicated by the flov <br />rates given on pages 44 and 44i where, for the year 1980, rates are shocm to be <br />identical above and below the mine site. Therefore, again, aubaidence should not <br />interrupt any significant water supply to Hubbard Creek. <br />To the date of this application, approximately 53 acres of the Hawkaneet <br />or (E) seam coal has been mined (see Exhibit c), about 19 acres of which have been <br />• partially or completely pillared. Very little influx of water has been observed (see <br />discussion of mine inflow above), even where substantial caving has occurred. This <br />123 iii (Rev. 1-25-R2) <br />