My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-10-07_PERMIT FILE - C1981047 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981047
>
2008-10-07_PERMIT FILE - C1981047 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:36:57 PM
Creation date
1/27/2009 3:11:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981047
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/7/2008
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.05 Operation and Reclamation Plans
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• The net conclusion is that potential effects of runoff from the mine site <br />area are not likely to have a significant effect on water quality of Hubbard Creek or <br />the North Fork. <br />Hydrologic studies of the mine site area and the area above indicate that <br />no interruption of the quantity of water flowing to Hubbard Creek will result because <br />of the mining activity. A small ephemeral drainage crosses the northwest corner of <br />the lease area and is the only drainage channel that crosses the affected area, <br />except Hubbard Creek. Large scale aerial photographs flown in 1975, 1976 and 1977 <br />clearly show this. <br />Mine aubaidence is not expected to have any significant affect on surface <br />or groundwater. There are no permanent streams over the areas that have been or will <br />be mined. A single ephemeral stream channel crosses the western and northern <br />portions of the area. An examination of a portion of this channel on December 9, <br />1981, showed no evidence of recent flow. Soil deposits and leaf debris, similar to <br />those on adjacent slopes, were found in the channel, along with a lack of any recent <br />• coarser-grained stream-laid deposits, scour, or any other indications of water flow. <br />Vegetation is well developed and mature in portions of the channel, further <br />indicating that flow is rare and probably quite short-lived when it does occur. <br />Subsidence could affect flow in this channel but the rarity of flow events makes it <br />clear that any reduction due to subsidence would have virtually no affect on the <br />average flow rate of Hubbard Creek. <br />The apparent rarity of flow in the ephemeral drainage discussed above, <br />together with the fact there are no known springs above the coal seam, indicate that <br />neither sheet wash nor subsurface flov from the area above the coal seam contribute <br />significantly to the flow of Hubbard Creek. This is further indicated by the flov <br />rates given on pages 44 and 44i where, for the year 1980, rates are shocm to be <br />identical above and below the mine site. Therefore, again, aubaidence should not <br />interrupt any significant water supply to Hubbard Creek. <br />To the date of this application, approximately 53 acres of the Hawkaneet <br />or (E) seam coal has been mined (see Exhibit c), about 19 acres of which have been <br />• partially or completely pillared. Very little influx of water has been observed (see <br />discussion of mine inflow above), even where substantial caving has occurred. This <br />123 iii (Rev. 1-25-R2) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.