Laserfiche WebLink
. 2.05.6(3) <br />Another way to analyze the impact on Hubbard Creek is to <br />analyze how the addition of 7 acre feet of relatively high <br />conductivity water impacts the quality of ,water in Hubbard Creek. It <br />is estimated that Hubbard Creek discharges 24,700 acre feet per year <br />(ref. page 43). Introduction of 7 acre feet per year with a <br />conductivity of 4900 into a 24,700 acre feet per year discharge with <br />a conductivity of 150 increases the conductivity of Aubbard Creek <br />about 1 umhos/cm. Clearly this 1 umhos/cm increase is an <br />insignificant impact to Hubbard Creek and the downstream receiving <br />waters. <br />The results of local studies on impacts of water quality <br />from coal mines and agriculture are pertinent here, for example: water <br />yields and quantity in the North Fork are strongly influenced by water <br />control through Paonia Reservoir, by water withdrawal from several <br />irrigation canals, and by return flows from irrigated lands back into <br />the river. Withdrawals at Somerset (Fire Mountain Canal), between <br />Bowie and Paonia (Stewart's Ditch) and just above Paonia (Farmer's <br />Ditch), withdraw significant flows and cause significant dewatering <br />of the North Fork of the Gunnison. Flow in Hubbard Creek is <br />significantly reduced by withdrawals to the Terror Creek and Overland <br />ditches above the mine and by the Deer Trail Ditch (see data provided <br />in Table W-4) between the mine and the North Fork River. <br />Approximately 77 percent of the consumptive water use in the North <br />Fork Valley is used for irrigation. Irrigation is also the primary <br />• factor causing increasing salinity, nutrients, sediment, and <br />herbicide/pesticide levels. Municipal, recreation, and evaporation <br />account for about six percent of the consumptive uses. There is <br />little industrial use or discharge of water. However, several coal <br />mines have operated in the past and are presently operating. Of <br />these, Mountain Coal Company, Somerset Mining Company and the Bear <br />Mines in the vicinity of Somerset are the most significant. The <br />effects of mining on the water quality of the North Fork of the <br />Gunnison are small compared to agriculture. Analysis of the river <br />above and below the now reclaimed Hawksnest Mine by the Colorado <br />Department of Health indicate increases in total hardness of 1.1 <br />percent, calcium hardness of 1.3 percent, electrical conductivity of <br />1.0 percent, suspended solids of 1.4 percent, and chlorides of 175 <br />percent. Analysis of the irrigation return flow below Paonia by the <br />Colorado Department of Health resulted in increase in total hardness <br />of 817 percent, calcium hardness of 998 percent, electrical <br />conductivity of 630 percent, suspended solids of 1200 percent, and <br />chlorides of 157 percent (Colorado Department of Health, 1975). <br />Sampling station numbers used in this comparison are NF 12 and 13 for <br />the Hawksnest Mine and NF 607 for irrigation return flows. Also, <br />lower flows due to irrigation dewatering of the North Fork of the <br />Gunnison River contribute to higher summer water temperatures. <br />• 122 (Rev. 12-16-92) <br />