My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-10-07_PERMIT FILE - C1981047 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981047
>
2008-10-07_PERMIT FILE - C1981047 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:36:57 PM
Creation date
1/27/2009 3:11:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981047
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/7/2008
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.05 Operation and Reclamation Plans
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ -,~-s~. <br />1675 cfs. The culvert is sized for 1,149 cfs therefore being 526 cfs under <br />designed. <br />Prior to the spring runoff in 1985 Blue Ribbon designed and installed <br />a dip section over the existing culvert. This dip section is designed to safely <br />pass the 526 cfs under design flow mentioned above. <br />The dip section was constructed using Tensar GM-1 Fabric to stabilize <br />the upstream and downstream slopes. This fabric functions like riprap or gab'ons <br />to protect the road embankment form eroding. The overtopping of the dip se ion <br />will likely be a gradual event. The water level upstream of the dip sect' n <br />will slowly increase until it starts to overtop. The water will then fl w over <br />the smooth compacted gravel surface and on down the stream with very 1' tle <br />turbulence being induced by the dip section. During 1985 the stream low did <br />overtop the dip section. During this event the dip section functio ed as designed <br />with little or no erosion occuring. <br />• The only disadvantage of a dip section is <br />be closed during peak runoff periods. According to <br />document the dip section would be overtopped from a <br />16 hours to 22 hours or a total of 6 hours during a <br />event. <br />The design of the dip section and the flog <br />that the c ossing would <br />the hydr graph of the permit <br />~proxim ely hydrograph time <br />20 ye r 24 hour peak runoff <br />calculations are presented <br />on Exhibit W. The design and construction are ce ified by a professional engineer <br />on the exhibit. <br />The No. 1 Pond was originally bu' t in 1977-78 when the bench and <br />access road were constructed. The emban ent along Hubbard Creek was constructed <br />for material removed from the pond sit This pond now serves for storage of <br />water rights in Blue Ribbon Reservoi No. 1 decreed in Case No. W-0351. A 4 <br />inch schedule 40 pipe was installe from Hubbard Creek into the pond in March <br />1983, capable of conveying the cfs decreed to Blue Ribbon Ditch. This pond <br />also serves as sediment contr for sub areas 2, 4, 5 and 7 see E_xhibit~H. Calcula- <br />• lions for the size and loc/a~ions of discharge structures are given in Appendix <br />1-B of the Slue Ribbon TQdhnical Revision Request for Mine Bench Stabilization. <br />During the mine bench ,stabilization project of 1984-85 the embankment was raised <br />106 (Rev. 3/21/86) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.