Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />January 26, 2009 <br />Mr. Daniel E. Bear <br />Bear Coal Company <br />P.O. Box 1754 <br />Paonia, Colorado 81428 <br />RE: Bear No. 3 Mine, Permit No. C-81-033, Bear Coal Company <br />2006 Annual Hydrology Report, Adequacy Review <br />Dear Mr. Bear: <br />COLORADO <br />D I V I S ION O F <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br />Bill Ritter, Jr. <br />Governor <br />Harris D. Sherman <br />Executive Director <br />Ronald W. Cattany <br />Division Director <br />Natural Resource Trustee <br />The Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety (Division) has finished its adequacy review of <br />the Bear No. 3 Mine 2006 Annual Hydrology Report (AHR) submitted by the Bear Coal Company (BCC). <br />The Division has only one request. Please provide revised AHR pages that list the method of analysis <br />(total, total dissolved, total recoverable etc.) for each of the chemical constituents sampled in the report. <br />The 2006 AHR followed the required sampling parameters and sampling frequencies list. The results of <br />the hydrologic monitoring program were generally consistent with data presented in previous AHRs. There <br />was a higher than usual reading of 6 mg/l for dissolved iron on August 22, 2006 for the downstream <br />station on the North Fork of the Gunnison River. Total dissolved solids also showed higher readings than <br />usual for both the upstream and downstream stations. Future AHRs will reveal whether or not these trends <br />continue. Nothing in the field or laboratory sampling results indicated a trend in any degradation of water <br />quality in the North Fork of the Gunnison River. The effect of the mine on the total dissolved solids in the <br />river water closely resembled the predicted effect in the Probable Hydrologic Consequences. <br />There seemed to be a slightly larger difference in conductivity between the upgradient alluvial well AA-3 <br />and the downgradient alluvial well AA-1 than in the previous year but less of a difference than in the years <br />immediately prior to 2005. Since the sampling of the two alluvial wells for the full suite analyses was made <br />during the fourth quarter, not enough water was available. Future sampling of the alluvial wells will take <br />place during the summer so well water should be available for full suite analyses. There were no water <br />quality exceedances in the pond discharges. <br />If you have any questions, please let me know. <br />H Sincerel , <br />t <br />os h J. dash <br />Environm ntal Protection Specialist <br />cc: Jim Stover (J.E. Stover & Associates) <br />Bill Bear (Bowie Resources LLC) <br />c:\word\bear3\2006ahradeq 1 <br />Office <br />Office of of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines