My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-01-08_INSPECTION - M1988048
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1988048
>
2009-01-08_INSPECTION - M1988048
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:39:37 PM
Creation date
1/15/2009 10:32:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988048
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
1/8/2009
Doc Name
Reclamation Information
From
L.G. Everist, Inc.
To
DRMS
Inspection Date
12/22/2008
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
We will establish a stormwater detention "pond" on the eastern boundary of the amendment <br />area; because during and after mining, the amendment area will be slightly lower than the <br />Phase 1 area to its east. The majority of the time, there will not be water in the "pond," but in <br />the case of a storm event, the "pond" will be of an adequate size to hold any excess water from <br />sheet run-off. Stormwater detention ponds should be able to hold 900 cubic feet of water per <br />acre. We are mining 83 acres, so the pond will be constructed to hold at least 74,700 cubic <br />feet. The pond will not be lined, to allow for percolation of stormwater into the soil. We will <br />maintain the pond after mining is completed. <br />We have a similar detention pond on the currently permitted area, which is part of our <br />Stormwater Management Plan, and which has worked well for detaining water in the rare storm <br />events. From our experience in this area, we have found that the surface topsoil and <br />overburden are very permeable. Our experience with large storm events for the past ten years <br />of operation has been that sheet run-off is minimal. Much of the rain water penetrates directly <br />into the soil it initially contacts during storm events. If there is any excess sheet flow, it follows <br />the contours of the area to the detention pond, where it remains until soaking into the ground. <br />In regards to the fiber optic cable along the western edge of the amendment area, we will <br />maintain a minimum of a 2:1 set-back. In other words, for every 1 foot of depth of excavation, <br />we will stay 2 feet distance from the cable. We will flag it prior to any mining operations in the <br />area to ensure that it not be affected in any way. <br />If you have any questions, or need more details on the reclamation, please call me. <br />Si9c y, <br />Lynn E. er <br />Regulato Compliance <br />cc: R. A. Everist, Andesite Rock Company <br />Kim Ogle, Weld County Planning <br />LM/C-vIreclmrev-0 50200
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.