My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-09-19_PERMIT FILE - C1981018A (11)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981018A
>
2008-09-19_PERMIT FILE - C1981018A (11)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:36:25 PM
Creation date
1/15/2009 10:22:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/19/2008
Section_Exhibit Name
Section IV. Mine Surface Facilities Operations Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• surveys looking for concentrated scat, nest and other indications of "lek" activity but to no avail. Low <br />level aerial reconnaissance, three separate times, and detailed analysis of aerial photographs were <br />also done. At best only three potential "lek" sites could be identified. They are indicated on Map <br />124. Consultation with Colorado Division of Wildlife personnel from the Denver office and Lou <br />Vidukovich, the local conservation officer, indicated that no known "leks" has been identified for the <br />area. A similar lack of knowledge was attested for the area of concern by BLM personnel from the <br />Meeker and Craig office. <br />A study of the specific impact area of concern having high sage grouse numbers was conducted <br />during the spring of 1981 to determine if "lek" activity occurred within the area of potential impact. <br />Since none were found, specific mitigation is avoidance of the one identified lek north of Cactus <br />Reservoir. No disturbances of any kind will occur at the lek approximately 100 meters north of <br />Cactus Reservoir. <br />Burrowing owls are thought to be declining in numbers. This is largely due to the demise of their <br />habitat. Burrowing owls nest in the burrows of large rodents such as prairie dogs and feed on small <br />rodents in grassland habitats. It has long been a practice of man to control populations of large <br />rodents and to cultivate many grasslands, so the potential habitat of burrowing owls has been <br />reduced. They do, however, occupy and are restricted to the grass habitat in the proposed disposal <br />site. They will be at least temporarily impacted as disposal occurs. Reclamation will be <br />• simultaneous with disposal as tracts are utilized and reclaimed at the same time. <br />The habitat affinities of three prime mammalian species are of concern: prairie dogs, bobcats and <br />pronghorn. Prairie dogs utilize several habitats in the area of potential impact, but are in significant <br />abundance in only one. Prairie dog populations are estimated at 290 per hectare in the grass <br />habitat in the proposed disposal site. These high populations are sufficient to support populations of <br />predators, potentially including black-footed ferrets, if any are present. Additionally, they provide <br />habitat for burrowing owls. Although there are substantial prairie dog populations to the north or into <br />Moffat County, disposal must and will be done carefully and systematically. Only necessary acres <br />will be disturbed at a time and reclamation will be simultaneous with new area utilization. This will <br />serve and restore the critical grass habitat as long and as soon as possible. <br />Bobcats are ubiquitous in a variety of habitats throughout the United States and cannot be delimited <br />to a specific habitat type. In the area of concern they seemed only to occupy the ledges along the <br />White River and the rocky pinyon-juniper habitat along the western border of the lease. This <br />restricted habitat occupation is not, however, due to habitat preference nor to ability to occupy other <br />habitats. It is likely due to extensive predator control in the livestock area and high pelt prices. The <br />proposed actions will not alter nor create problems with their habitat but will create problems for the <br />bobcat. The perturbation value of 5 is based on increased accessibility, more people in the area <br />and hunting pressure associated with such. <br />• Permit Rev. 4 (11/2002) IV-47 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.