My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-12-31_REPORT - M1988044
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1988044
>
2008-12-31_REPORT - M1988044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:39:21 PM
Creation date
1/2/2009 3:43:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988044
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
12/31/2008
Doc Name
2008 Annual Report
From
SES
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
is actually somewhat of a distortion that will be examined in 2009. When combining all the plants <br />along a single transect into one set of data there is no way to determine whether there is, in fact, a <br />change in community structure defined by some kind of boundary or transition zone. Visually, it is <br />evident that the cottonwoods are clustered somewhat more toward the eastern and higher elevation <br />land and the willows are clustered somewhat more toward the western side, adjacent to the big <br />wetland or in the big wetland where it encroaches into the exclosure. This is a bit more visible on the <br />middle transect and is the total pattern on the southern transect. <br />It is also significant that the greatest gains in cottonwood growth were along the southern and <br />the middle transect with actually a decline in mean height for cottonwood on the northern transect. <br />This all further supports the idea that Exclosure 2 actually contains two rather distinct vegetation <br />forms. Thus, in 2009, the task will be to not only monitor the overall changes, but to identify the <br />nature of the transition between the community where willow seems to predominate and the <br />community where cottonwood is dominant. This was vaguely identifiable in 2006 and, by visual <br />inspection of the site and the raw data, appears to be a bit more evident now, but still showing a lot <br />of overlap. Perhaps in 2009 this will resolve itself better and provide some more definite information <br />regarding how willow and cottonwood growth blend across a gradual topographic gradient. <br />2008 Annual Report Coal Creek Wetland Mitigation Permit DA 198811488 Page 10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.