My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-12-04_PERMIT FILE - C1994082A (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1994082A
>
2008-12-04_PERMIT FILE - C1994082A (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:38:36 PM
Creation date
12/30/2008 2:38:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/4/2008
Doc Name
Drainage and Sediment Control Plan
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 13 Attachment 13-12
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
February 1999 YoartlLline * 13-12 Drainage and Sediment Control Plan • 14 <br />7.0 TOPSOIL STOCKPILE SAE <br />A request for a small area exemption (SAE) has been included in this submittal to cover the planned topsoil <br />stockpiles at the Yoast mine. Runoff from the stockpiles will be controlled by constructing a small <br />containment berm immediately down-gradient of the piles. The SAE request is presented in AppendixY 13- <br />12.4, Topsoil Stockpile SAE. <br />8.0 STOCK POND DESIGN <br />The construction of stock ponds is proposed in conjunction with the construction of various postmine <br />channels. Locations are shown on Exhibit 13-12.1A, Permanent Channel and Pond Watersheds. <br />Since the stock ponds are relatively small in size and there are no residential or commercial structures or <br />mining operations immediately below any of the stock ponds, they do not create a threat to public health <br />and safety or threaten significant environmental health. <br />SCC has constructed numerous stock ponds (temporary and permanent) in the Seneca II and II-W <br />reclaimed areas, which continue to function as designed and according to the applicable requirements of <br />Rule 4.05.9. Designs for the proposed stock ponds ST-1 and ST-2 are presented in Appendix 13-12.5, <br />Stockpond Emergency Spillway Design SEDCAD Results. A certified as-built of each stock pond will <br />be submitted following construction. <br />All stock ponds are located in reclaimed areas and are not primary sediment control structures. They are <br />relatively small with a storage capacity of not more than two (2) acre-feet and an embankment height no <br />greater than five (5) feet measured from the invert of the spillway to the upstream toe of the embankment. <br />The combined slope of all the embankments will be less than 5H:1V with no slopes greater than 2H:1V. <br />All stock ponds will contain a single open channel spillway designed to safely pass a 25-yr/24-hr <br />precipitation event. The spillway will be configured to have a minimum of one (1) foot of freeboard. <br />Riprap requirements were determined using the PADER Method and adding three (3) inches to account for <br />conservatism. Emergency spillway configurations and riprap size for each stock pond location is presented <br />in the Table 13-12.8, Stock Pond Spillway Summary. <br />TABLE° 13=12:8 <br />STOCK POND SPILLWAY SUMiViARY <br />Pond 25-yr Flow <br />(cfs) Bottom Width <br />(ft) Depth of Flow <br />(ft) Freeboard <br />(ft) Riprap <br />Dso <br />(in) <br />ST-1. 18.5 10 0.3 1.0 6 <br />ST-2 44.2 10 0.8 1.0 9 <br />The Colorado Office of the State Engineer was contacted regarding jurisdiction for the permanent stock <br />ponds at the Seneca II Mine Qanuary 2003). According to the Division Engineer and as stated in Section <br />35-49-107(2) CSR, any dams that are less than five feet high and impound less than two acre-feet of water <br />would not fall under their jurisdiction. <br />The Yoast Mine will incorporate the typical stability analysis for all proposed and future stock ponds based <br />on the worst-case condition experienced and analyzed at the Seneca II Mine. The rationale for using this <br />approach is based on relatively small size of the impoundment, the construction material consists of the <br />same general strata, and the extremely conservative inputs used in the analysis. <br />A Stock Pond Stability Analysis, conducted for the Seneca II Mine (Tab 13, Appendix 13-9A, Seneca II <br />Montgomery [Y~atron Mining Group * 16S S. Unian Boulevarr~ Suite 460 * Lakewood, Colorado 80228 * (303) 763-5140 <br />TR_37 Revised 08/08 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.