Laserfiche WebLink
The Division has no further concerns. The November 26, 2008 submittal contained an <br />appropriately revised page 2.05-37. <br />17. Please add a discussion to Section 2.05.6(3) of the permit application on the probable <br />hydrologic consequences of the Bear Creek fan site on Bear Creek. <br />The Division has no further concerns. The currently approved discussion in the permit <br />application also applies to the Bear Creek fan site area. In order to update the discussion, <br />however, in the November 26, 2008 submittal, Oxbow provided revised permit text pages <br />2.05-89, 93a and 93b that include references to the Bear Creek fan site facility. <br />19. The second paragraph on the revised page that contains Table 2.05-E5-T2 contains a <br />discussion on the reclamation of satellite facilities. Please add the Bear Creek fan site to <br />this discussion. Also, please add the appropriate page number to this page. <br />The Division has no further concerns. Page 2 of Section 2.05-E5 was revised <br />appropriately in the November 26, 2008 submittal. <br />20. In the first sentence of the last paragraph on revised page 2.05-12b, please include the <br />correct exhibit numbers for the two referenced exhibits. <br />A revised page 2.05-12b was provided in the November 26, 2008 submittal. However, <br />please revise page 2.05-12b to read Exhibit 2.05-M6 Sheet 7 of 7, not Sheet 6 of 6. <br />21. Please revise the "Main Postmine Channel Design " summary sheet to show that the <br />bottom width is 8 feet, instead of 1 foot, and the side slopes are 2H.•I V, instead of 3H.•1 V <br />for ditch BCPCD-M. <br />cc: Sandy Brown <br />c:/word/elkcreek/tr60memo2 <br />6