Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />Table 3 shows comparisons between 2000 and 2008. There were 43 sites visited in both <br />years. <br />Table 3: Rating Comparisons for 2000 and 2008 from Table 1. <br />Category Site Ratings by °/a by Site Ratings by % by <br /> Year Category Year Category <br /> 2000 2000 2008 2008 <br />Excellent 1 2.5 16 41 <br />Good 18 45 19 49 <br />Fair 20 50 4 10 <br />Poor 1 2.5 <br />Totals 40 100 39 100 <br />NA 3 4 <br />I-'orty of the 43 sites were rated in 2000. The three un-rated sites were: <br />JM13-13, which slumped prior to 2000. <br />Box Canyon (Q) 96-14-2.. which wasn't constructed in 2000. <br />0 <br />,IMB-8, which wasn't included in the 2000 report. <br />In 2008. 39 sites were rated. Those not considered were: <br />JMB-13. (See above) <br />Box Canyon (Q) 96-14-2, which was constructed in 1996 and is still in use. <br />RAV-5 (.I) MDW 19-03.04. which is still in use. <br />RAV-9 (J-Alt). which is still in use. <br />0 <br />In 2000, nineteen sites (47.5'%) were rated Good /Excellent while twenty-one sites <br />(52.5%,) were in the Fair/Poor categoti,. <br />In 2008, thirty-five sites (90'%,) were rated Good/Excellent while four sites (100%) <br />were in the Fair category. Of these four sites, hvo were reclaimed in 2006. (RAV-1 <br />(L) MDW 23-06, 07,07A) and RAV-6 (L-Alt, MDW' 23-06). No sites rated Poor. <br />4 (?